Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Birla Sunlife Asset Management Company v. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : [2010] 38 SOT 523 (MUM)
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Court :Mumbai bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal

Citation : Birla Sunlife Asset Management Company v. ITO [2010] 38 SOT 523 (MUM),

Brief :Asset management company can be treated as an agent of its non-resident investors under section 163 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

Facts of the case

• The taxpayer an asset management company of a mutual fund, made payments to the investors residing in United Arab Emirates (UAE), upon redemption of units of a debt scheme of a Mutual Fund, without any deduction of tax at source.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031