Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tube Investments of India Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 47. As the challenge in all these writ petitions is to the vires of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, it will be appropriate to extract the provision as it stood as on the date of the challenge: “Section 40. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in sections 30 to 38, the following amounts shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession- (a) in the case of an assessee- (i)….. (A)….. (B)….. (ia) any interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalty, fees for profes...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930