The Delhi High Court, in Purshottam Ray vs CGST, rejected a writ challenging a massive GST demand in a bogus invoice scam, directing the petitioner to file a delayed appeal.
The Allahabad High Court granted a stay on proceedings against Maa Vindhya Vasini Tobacco challenging a GST levy calculated on a compounded basis using assumed manufacturing capacity.
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a review petition filed by Kunal BSBK Joint Venture seeking GST reimbursement from the Chhattisgarh Housing Board, holding that the petition lacked an error apparent on the record and was an attempt to re-argue the contractual dispute.
The High Court allowed a writ petition, ruling that the mere expiry of an e-way bill due to an unforeseen vehicle breakdown and subsequent transshipment of goods does not, in itself, establish an intent to evade tax under Section 129(3) of the GST Act.
The Delhi High Court relegated Ortho Clinical Diagnostics to the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act to challenge a ₹39.82 crore GST demand and penalty based on the classification of reagent and equipment supplies as ‘mixed supply’ at the highest rate of 18%.
Form GST ASMT-10 plays a central role in this scrutiny process. It is used by the tax authorities to formally notify registered taxpayers about observed discrepancies in their returns, and to provide a chance to explain or correct them before any further action is taken.
