ITAT Mumbai held that passing of assessment order u/s. 144/147 making addition of alleged bogus purchase which is already added vide assessment order passed u/s. 143(3)/147 and has attained finality is unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
Madras High Court held that tax confirmed on premise of non-furnishing of required documents, however, none of the documents were called for in the show cause notice. Accordingly, order set aside and matter remanded.
Stanley Black & Decker India faces penalties under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 for delays in CSR fund transfers due to COVID-19 restrictions.
ITAT Bangalore held that advances given to the director by the company for commercial purpose is outside the ambit of provisions of deemed dividend as provided under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act.
Understand the Ahmedabad ITAT ruling that payments for certification services by foreign entities are not taxable in India without a fixed place of business. Full order analysis.
ITAT Mumbai held that no transfer pricing adjustment could have been made in the hands of assessee on account of ALP of specified domestic transactions as section 92BA(i) of Income Tax Act was omitted. Thus, since provisions of section 92D are not applicable, penalty u/s. 271G of the Income Tax Act untenable.
Rajasthan High Court held that section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act read with CBDT Circular No.09/2015 dated 09.06.2015 clearly reflect that if there is a genuine hardship, then a condonation of upto six years can be permitted. Accordingly, writ allowed.
Understand the key requirements for the Directors Report under the Companies Act 2013, including disclosure, compliance, and approval details for 2024.
Ramax Nidhi Limited faces a penalty for failing to include PAN and email details of security holders in Form PAS-3. MCA imposes a fine of Rs. 40,000.
Explore IRDAI’s order on HDFC Life Insurance Co. Ltd., addressing violations, regulatory issues, and the insurer’s submissions. Detailed analysis and conclusions provided.