Simplify GST learning with memory techniques. Join live sessions, master CGST sections, and retain knowledge effortlessly. Register now for practical GST mastery!
Discover the mandatory geo-coding process for GST address verification in India. Learn the benefits, procedure, and requirements for accurate compliance.
Read the Delhi High Court judgment on Saroj Gagneja’s case against retrospective GST registration cancellation. Learn why the court deemed the cancellation unjust and the fair process upheld.
Read the Delhi High Court judgment in R.K. Metal Industries’ case. Learn why GST registration cannot be arbitrarily cancelled due to non-filing of returns. Retrospective cancellation overturned.
Dive into the complexity of Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs), exploring their dual identity as debt and equity, tax implications, and regulatory challenges.
PCIT vs. Minu Bakshi: Delhi High Court Clarifies No Penalty if notice for the imposition of penalty did not specify particular limb of Section 271(1)(c) under which penalty was levied.
CIT (Exemptions) Vs Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation, Delhi High Court emphasized that penalty notice must specify precise limb of Section 271(1)(c) under which penalty is imposed.
Empower your students’ literary analysis skills with plot map worksheets! This teacher’s guide explores the significance and practical implementation of plot map templates, fostering comprehension, critical thinking, and engaging discussions in the classroom. Choose age-appropriate worksheets, introduce the concept effectively, model the process, and encourage annotation and discussion to boost your students’ love for reading and analytical thinking
ITAT has deleted the entire addition and disallowance based for imposition of penalty, the penalty imposed so cannot continue and therefore, deserves to be deleted in full with reference to aforesaid the addition & disallowance.
Madras High Court held that order passed without granting video conference hearing as sought by the petitioner is unsustainable as it is clearly violation of principles of natural justice.
ITAT Chennai held that disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act on loans and advances given to subsidiary company unjustified as investment in subsidiary is purely for commercial expediency.
