Explore Bhailal Babubhai Patel Vs PCIT case in Gujarat High Court. Learn why a valid show-cause notice is crucial for recovery under Section 179.
Importance of Form FC-GPR under RBI guidelines for foreign investments in India. Learn filing process, due dates, and implications of late submissions
ITAT Delhi held that when the assessee has shown cash withdrawals during pre demonetization period more than the cash deposited during demonetization then the source cannot be disputed. Accordingly, addition u/s. 68 deleted.
Bombay High Court held that the reopening of the assessment order based on change of opinion without surfacing of any tangible new information is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that construction service provided under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) are exempted from the clutches of service tax. Accordingly, demand of service tax set aside.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that Sale/ conversion of business of assessee-firm as a going concern to company for consideration of paid up share capital does not amount to transfer liable to tax as capital gains.
ITAT Delhi quashed the penalty order passed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act as service of notice by way of affixture on the Assessee cannot be construed as sufficient Service of Notice.
In present facts of the case, the Revision Petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails order dated 06.02.2015 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 assailing the order dated 11.08.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur.
Read about penalty and 1-year debarment imposed by NFRA on CA Apoorve Bansal of M/s SVP & Associates for statutory audit of SRS Limited for Financial Year 2017-18.
