2 Archive - August, 2022

"August, 2022" Archive - Page 20

ITAT deletes section 271C penalty in respect of EDC Amount paid to HUDA

Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi)

In this case, AO pass order levying penalty amounting to Rs.6,62,100/- u/s 271C of Income Tax Act (being 2% of the EDC amount paid to HUDA)....

Read More

Vishwanath Builders guilty of profiteering in its project ‘Sarathya’

Mahendra Kishanlal Prajapati Vs Vishwanath Builders (NAA)

Mahendra Kishanlal Prajapati Vs Vishwanath Builders (NAA) The Authority finds that the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit of 3.75% of the turnover has accrued to the Respondent for the project ‘Sarathya’. This benefit was required to be passed on to the recipients. Thus, Section 171 of the CGST, 2017 has been contravened b...

Read More

Delhi HC admit petition against Section 148A(d) order & grants interim relief

Logix Infratech Private Limited Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)

Logix Infratech Private Limited Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28th July, 2022 passed under Section 148A(d) along with notice dated 28th July, 2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for the assessment year 2013-14 and the proceedings initiated ...

Read More

Prohibition on institution of suits or continuation of pending suits after declaration of moratorium under IBC

Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Under section 13 of the Code, the adjudicating authority after admission of the application under section 7 or 9 or 10 of the IBC Code shall declare a moratorium which shall include the prohibition of the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against...

Read More

Consequences of Non Payment of TDS/TCS & Non filing of TDS/TCS Returns

Note 1. Where the Person responsible for deducting tax, fails to do so, then he shall be deemed to be assessee in default. Note 2. As per Section 221, Penalty shall not be charged, until AO is satisfied that, default was for good and sufficient reasons. Section Nature of default Consequences 271C Fails to deduct […]...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

ITAT allows reconciliation of difference between return of income & Form 26AS

Vijay Pal Jhamb Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)

Assessee deserves one more opportunity to reconcile difference between contract receipts as shown in return of income & Form No. 26AS -ITAT...

Read More

Different yardsticks not allowed for same property sale transaction by co-owners

Babubhai Shantilal Solanki Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

2 different yardsticks for same set of sale transaction made by co-owners not allowed. Assessee cannot be treated differently for similar transaction...

Read More

SEBI Penalty for shortfall in margin money eligible for section 37 Deduction

DJS Stock and Shares Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Penalty charged levied by SEBI related to shortfall in margin money is not for infraction of any law. hence allowable under section 37...

Read More

CESTAT upheld absolute confiscation of smuggled gold bars

Rameshbhai Lakhabhai Patel Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

No dispute about illicit transaction of smuggling of old bars. So Commissioner (A) has rightly upheld absolute confiscation of gold bars....

Read More

Addition for excess Gold – ITAT extends benefit of CBDT Instruction to mother of married female assessee

Muppavarapu Kavitha Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Mother of assessee is staying with her and hence benefit of CBDT Instruction No. 1916 should also be extended to the mother of assessee...

Read More