DSOB Class of 64 Charitable Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Learned counsel submitted that the addition was made on account of non-furnishing of the audit report in form 10B through electronic mode. Learned counsel submitted that the learned CIT(Appeals) has noted the fact that return of income was filed on 31.08.2018 and the audit report […]
Harsh Kaushal Corporation Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) In the present case, it is evident from the reasons recorded for reopening that the petitioner had truly and fully disclosed all material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment. In fact, in the reasons for reopening, there is not even a whisper as to what was […]
Considering the fact that professional misconduct has been proved, NFRA imposes monetary penalty of Rs 100,000 upon CA Gulshan Jagdish Jham.
Further, there is lack of communication between the tax advisors and the Board of Directors due to which the appeal could not be filed before this Tribunal within stipulated time. He stated that this appeal was filed with a delay of 423 days when a call received from the office of Tax Recovery Officer regarding tax arrears and made enquiries with tax counsel, came to know that the appeal against the order of CIT(A) is required to be filed.
HT Media Limited & Anr. Vs www.Hindustantimes.Tech & Anr. (Delhi High Court) HC directs blocking of website www.Hindustantimes.Tech is restrained from using the domain name hindustantimes.tech or any other mark, name or domain name, which consists of the word ‘Hindustan Times’ or is deceptively similar to the mark of the HT Media Limited. www.Hindustantimes.Tech is also […]
Maya Rathi Vs ITO (Rajasthan High Court) We find that the validity of first proviso to Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 has been assailed on the ground that the explanation ‘income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment’, has been restricted in its meaning under the explanation-1 to that provisions. Learned counsel for the […]
Yamuna Cables Accessories Pvt. Ltd. Vs Desai Enterprise (Gujarat High Court) Learned advocate Mr. S. P. Majmudar appeared for the petitioner and learned senior advocate Mr. B. S. Patel with learned advocate Mr. Umang Oza appeared for the respondents. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court […]
Balram Shitaldas Ahuja Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The assessee’s sole substantive grievance contested during the course of hearing challenges correctness of both the lower authorities action disallowing its mortgage expenditure of Rs.55 lakhs as cost of acquisition with the corresponding indexation. Distinction between the mortgage created by the previous owner which is discharged by the […]
Uttam Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee had filed its return of income under Section 139(1) on 13.09.2013. Thus, as per proviso to Section 143(2) of the Act, as it existed prior to its amendment by Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f. 01.06.2016, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act shall be served on […]
ACIT Vs GP Global Energy Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) In so far as bench marking the international transactions using customs data is concerned we sustain the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) as the Ld. CIT(A) observed that the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Coastal Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (supra) held […]
