The positive message from four Pr. Chief Commissioners during the VC held on the occasion was reassuring in that, while there was a lot to do in the future, we are on the right track and only needed to pursue our policy goals more vigorously. The impression that was carried at the end of the day was that CBIC has in the last three years truly shouldered its responsibilities well.
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs M/s Neeva Foods Pvt, Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) 1. The present Report dated 27.12.2019 has been furnished by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, The briefzs facts of the case are that a reference was received […]
Aruna Oswal Vs Pankaj Oswal & Ors. (Supreme Court) Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the basis of the petition is the claim by way of inheritance of 1/4th shareholding so as to constitute 10% of the holding, which right cannot be decided in proceedings under section 241/242 of the Act. Thus, filing of the petition […]
ITO Vs Adul Kayum Ahmed Mohd. tamboli (ITAT Mumbai) The hearing of the matter was concluded on 19/02/2020 and in terms of Rule 34(5) of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, the matter was required to be pronounced within a total period of 90 days. As per sub-clause (c) of Rule 34(5), every endeavor was […]
The present writ petition is based on the facts that owing to the advent of the new GST regime in case petitioner who is registered with GST is of the view that, is not liable to pay tax for these period need not file GST returns showing nil, but the provisions of the Act envisages requirement of filing returns.
