Tariff Notification No. 26/2020-Customs (N.T.) in respect of Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Poppy Seeds, Areca Nut, Gold and Silver Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) (Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs) Notification No. 26/2020-CUSTOMS (N.T.) New Delhi, 18th March, 2020 28 Phalguna, 1941 (SAKA) S.O. 1126(E)– […]
In re Prasa Infocom & Power Solutions Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) From the discussions made above we find that, as per the subject agreement and documents submitted by the applicant, the major part of the contract is supply of goods. These goods are sold to the client by the applicant and they receive separate […]
In order to contain the spread of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), some precautionary measures are required to be taken by all the employees and the Ministries/Departments. In this regard, it has been decided to issue the following advisory for the well-being of Government employees and in public interest.
As Central Government has extended due date for filing Form GSTR 3B on various occasions for various class of person, for various states etc. Whether Central Government is right in demanding interest on late payment of liability from original due date of filing Form GSTR 3B? or extension of due date is applicable only for waiver of late fees?
The interest liability for any belated remittance is an economic consequence. The tax laws are no exception to this rule. GST law provides for interest @18% on the delayed remittance of the tax after due date. However, there was an ambiguity as to whether the interest has to be paid on Gross Tax liability (i.e. the total output tax) or on the Net Tax Liability (the Tax liability to be paid in cash after adjusting the Input Tax Credit).
On agricultural Land no tax is payable when the compensation/enhanced compensation is received by the assessee as their land were agricultural land. The compensation was received in respect of agricultural land belonging to the assessee which had been acquired by the state government.
It is pertinent to note that the Assessing Officer admitted the claim of the assessee for exemption u/s 54F(1)(b) in respect of investment on long term capital gain but instead of taking actual sale consideration received, has adopted the figure of sale consideration by invoking Section 50C. This is not in accordance with the provision of Section 50C which has created a deeming fiction. Section 54F is an exemption provision and it has given its applicability in itself, therefore, Section 50C will not come under picture.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has recently issued exposure draft on Standard of Internal Audit (SIA)- 150- ‘Compliance with laws and Regulations’. Here in this article we would briefly understand the Internal Auditor’s Responsibility with regard to Compliance with Laws and Regulations.
The place of supply in case of import of goods, is the location of the importer in terms of section 11(a) of the IGST Act 2017 and in the case of applicant the location of the importer is the state of Karnataka where the applicant has obtain the GST registration. Therefore, the applicant though import the goods to the port nearest to the location of the receipient, said imported goods are deemed to have been supplied to the location of the importer
In re Water Health India Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether supply of purified water to public in empty unsealed cans is exempt under GST law? Supply of purified water whether in sealed container or unsealed container not entitled for GST exemption as the purified water excluded from the Sl. No. 99 of notification No. […]
