Follow Us :

Archive: 28 April 2019

Posts in 28 April 2019

Live Course on Appeal, Pleading & Drafting under GST by CA Sachin Jain

May 15, 2024 7179 Views 0 comment Print

oin us for an immersive live course led by renowned expert CA Sachin Jain, as we delve into the intricacies of appeal, pleading, and drafting under GST.

HC upheld provisions of Section 115BBDA: Tax on dividend above ₹ 10 Lakh

April 28, 2019 16179 Views 0 comment Print

Rajan Bhatia Vs CBDT (Delhi High Court) Section 115BBDA is a non-obstante provision that would apply and prevail over Section 10(34) of the Act. Section 115 BBDA states that notwithstanding anything contained in the Act, where the total income of a specified resident assessee, includes income by way of dividend declared, distributed or paid by […]

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) on Disclosure of income due to search operation 

April 28, 2019 1038 Views 0 comment Print

Brijesh Jaikishin Rupani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that The income offered by assessee in income filed pursuant to issue of notice under section 153A was the income detected during the course of search and seizure operation. The case of assessee was squarely covered by provisions of Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c), because […]

Section 80IB(10) deduction cannot be denied merely because land was held by original owner during project execution

April 28, 2019 1905 Views 0 comment Print

Where assessee had claimed deduction under section 80-IB in respect to income of housing development project, the same could not be rejected merely because the land was held by original owner when the housing development project was executed, would not be detrimental to assessee’s claim of deduction under section 80-IB(10).

High Court not justified in issuing remarks / direction against DCIT: SC

April 28, 2019 1449 Views 0 comment Print

High Court was not justified in its remarks against the petitioner and in issuing the directions which it has issued. The High Court, in the course of its judgment has issued a slew of directions including: (i) The necessity of weeding out ‘deadwood’; (ii) imposition of costs of Rs. 1.5 lakhs which are to be apportioned among two officers, out of them being the petitioner; (iii) Making an adverse entry in the Annual Confidential Reports of the petitioner; and (iv) Denial of promotion including monetary benefits to the petitioner.

Search Post by Date
May 2024