"September, 2018" Archive - Page 5

Revision U/s. 263 cannot be done if AO has taken Plausible view resulting in revenue loss

Agasthiya Granite (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (Madras High Court)

If the view taken by the AO was a plausible view and if it results in loss of revenue, it could not be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue for the purpose of invoking the power under section 263....

Read More

Individual cannot be taxed for Property sold by HUF

Janak Kanakbhai Trivedi Vs Income Tax Officer (Gujarat High Court)

Janak Kanakbhai Trivedi Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) It is the case of the appellant that the impugned ancestral property was actually acquired by the HUF of the appellant and that actually by mistake the appellant has given his individual PAN number at the time of execution of the sale deed. It has been argued […]...

Read More

Who Can File an Affidavit ? Beware before you swear!

People file affidavits being unaware of what its repercussions might be and also unaware of the fact whether they are at all competent to make the affidavit. Before analysing who can file an affidvit, it is important to understand the duty bestowed upon a person providing affidavit. Even before that let us first understand what an affidav...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Goods And Services Tax Practitioners (GSTP)

In the erstwhile regime, chartered accountants, sales tax practitioners and advocates undertake the job related to accounting and taxation related to Indirect taxes mechanism in India. Under the GST regime, a GST practitioner has been authorized for conducting such activities and  formalizing the association shared between a tax payer an...

Read More

VAT reimbursement: Whether capital receipt or revenue receipt?

Pr. CIT Vs Deepak Vegpro (P) Ltd. (Rajasthan High Court)

PCIT Vs Deepak Vegpro (P) Ltd. (Rajasthan High Court) Finance Act, 2015 with effect from 1-4-2016, has enlarged the definition of income given under section 2 (24) by inserting sub-clause (xviii), which reads as under :– (xviii) assistance in the form of a subsidy or grant or cash incentive or duty drawback or waiver or […]...

Read More

No deduction U/s. 54F for amount not invested in CGAS within period U/s. 139(1) or 139(4)

Bolishetty Venkatesh Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Where assessee failed to deposit the unutilized sales consideration under Capital Gain Account Scheme within the period specified under section 139(1) or 139(4), AO was justified in restricting the claim of deduction to the expenditure incurred upto the due date of filing return of income....

Read More

18% GST Payable on works contract undertaken by MPPKVVCL

In re Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran co.Ltd. (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh)

In re Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) The applicant – Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Limited (MPPKVVCL) wishes to know whether clause (vi)(a) of Sr. No. 3 of table of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017 is applicable on the works c...

Read More

No separate category of ‘Commodity Derivatives Exchanges’ w.e.f. October 1, 2018

Circular No. SEBI/HO/CDMRD/DMP/CIR/P/201 8/133 28/09/2018

As per the amendments in Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Stock Exchanges and Clearing Corporations) Regulations, 2012 as notified on April 02, 2018 in the Gazette of India, there would be no separate category of ‘Commodity Derivatives Exchanges’ w.e.f. October 1, 2018....

Read More

PP Leno bags of woven PP fabric classifiable as Sacks & Bags under HSN 63053300

In re RLJ Woven Sacks Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR West Bengal)

In re RLJ Woven Sacks Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR West Bengal) ‘PP Leno Bags’, if specifically made from woven Polypropylene fabric using strips or the like of width not exceeding 5 mm and without any impregnation, coating, covering, or lamination with plastics, are to be classified under Tariff Sub Heading 63053300. FULL TEXT OF ORDER [&hellip...

Read More

Deduction allowable for Salary / interest to partners in computing undisclosed profit

ACIT Vs Balakrishna & Co. &Vice-Versa (ITAT Ranchi)

Where the partners of assessee firm were working partners entitled to salary and interest as per the partnership dead payment of such interest and salary was allowable in case best judgment assessment is made by AO....

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax | |

Search Posts by Date

June 2021