"12 February 2017" Archive

In a case of circumstantial evidence, the conviction is not sustainable only on account of recovery of bloodstained articles from the accused unless there are other corroborative evidence.

Ram Adhin Vs State Of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

There must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused...

Read More

Interplay between Article 9 of India Netherlands DTAA & Transfer Pricing law

Shell Global Solutions International BV Vs DDIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

These appeals raise an interesting issue with respect to interplay of Article 9 of India Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and TP adjustments under domestic TP law....

Read More

Tribunal recalled order having mistake apparent from record

Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)

These bunch of miscellaneous applications have been filed by different assessees viz., Reliance Communications Ltd., (formerly known as Reliance Infocom Ltd.), Reliance Communications Infrastructure Ltd., Reliance BPO Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Reliance Infostream Pvt. Ltd.) and Reliance Telecom Ltd....

Read More

Sec. 50C not applies to unregistered sale agreements prior to 01.10.2009

Krishna Enterprises vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2007-08 in the matter of order passed u/s. 143(3) of the I.T.Act....

Read More

District-level Caste Scrutiny Committee had no jurisdiction to revoke caste-status

Smt. Chandra Kumari Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

This petition is directed against the order Annexure P-32 whereby the District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee has revoked the caste certificate issued in favour of the petitioner on 10-10-1991 by the Collector, Durg, holding that she does not belong to Scheduled Tribe as notified and therefore she is not entitled for the caste certificate...

Read More

Sec 269ST– Cash receipt– danger ahead

Section 269ST as being proposed in the budget 2017, makes acceptance of Rs. 3,00,000/- in cash as an offence. There are no caveats like it is applicable only for business receipt etc....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law |

Write-offs (Banks)- IND-AS/ IFRS

While Indian Banks will converge towards Ind-AS (IFRS) with effect from 1 April 2018 onwards, Some of them already started taking action to make their books in line with the requirements of Ind-AS....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law |

GST: Section 104 Interest on Refund of Pre-Deposit

Section 104 pertains to refund on mandatory pre-deposit made at first appellate authority and tribunal. This section states that where an amount deposited by the appellant under sub-section (6) of section 98 or under sub-section (9) of section 101 is required to be refunded consequent to any order of the First Appellate Authority or of th...

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law |

Request to comply with provisions of Companies Act, 2013

Ministry of Corporate Affairs to analyse the compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rules thereon wherein it was discussed that the members should take due care in enhancing compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law |

Empanelment of practicing CAs as Mediator or Conciliator

Regarding Empanelment of professionals having at least fifteen years of continuous as a Chartered Accountant with Regional Directors of the respective Region as Mediator or Conciliator for the year 2017-2018....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law |

Search Posts by Date

August 2021