The Reserve Bank of India today released the Macroeconomic and Monetary Developments, Second Quarter Review 2013-14. The document serves as a backdrop to the Second Quarter Review of Monetary of Policy 2013-14 to be announced on October 29, 2013.
Author has attempted to assess the impact of the financial crisis on banks’ efficiency considering Net Interest Margin (NIM) as an efficiency indicator for the Indian banks. By employing disaggregated bank level data across different ownership categories, the author has analysed the factors influencing Indian banks’ margin.
The anti-dumping duty imposed under this notification shall be effective for a period of five years (unless revoked, superseded or amended earlier) from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.
How to Search Companies/Directors under Prosecution Under Companies Act, 1956? MCA has recently added a facility under which a user can search the name of the Company or Directors on which prosecution is going on under the Companies Act, 1956.
The undisputed fact accepted by the assessee is that Mr. Tarun Goyal was running a racket of providing accommodation entries by floating numerous companies. The modus operandi brought out by the AO in the assessment order, is not disputed by the assessee.
In case of transmission of securities in dematerialized mode, where the securities are held in a single name without a nominee, the existing threshold limit of Rs. 1,00,000 (Rupees One lakh only) per beneficiary owner account has now been revised to Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees Five lakh only),
Whether the Tribunal has power in terms of Rule 24 of the Tribunal Rules to dismiss an appeal before it without considering the merits of the appeal and only on the ground for want of prosecution?
No penalty initiated under Section 271(1)(c) of I.T. Act 1961was justified for disallowance made under normal provisions when assessee was assessed under MAT provisions.
The provisions of section 40(a)(ia) as stood prior to the amendments made by the Finance Act 2010 thus were resulting into unintended consequences and causing grave and genuine hardships to the assessees who had substantially complied with the relevant TDS provisions by deducting the tax at source and by paying the same to the credit of the Government before the due date of filing of their returns u/s 139(1).
The challenge in this petition is to the Circular dated 6th March, 2013 issued by the 1st respondent. The said circular lays down the procedure of preparation of a panel of Auditors and Auditing firms in accordance with the third proviso to sub-section (1) (a) of Section 81 of the Maharashtra
