Follow Us:

Archive: 2012

Posts in 2012

Income Tax Refund Declines to 46K Crore from 60K Crore

October 22, 2012 1478 Views 0 comment Print

The Income Tax refunds during the first half of current financial year have come down to Rs 46,000 crore from Rs 60,000 crore in the same period last year.

Non-life insurance companies demand relaxation from MAT

October 22, 2012 981 Views 0 comment Print

. Some of the participating CEOs raised tax related issues including non-applicability of MAT for non-life insurance sector at par with life insurance companies and zero rated service sector on crop insurance, tools, senior citizen policy, RSBY and other exempt categories.

Facilities for Persons Resident outside India – FIIs

October 22, 2012 1267 Views 0 comment Print

As per the extant guidelines, only designated branches of AD Category I banks maintaining accounts of FIIs are allowed to act as market makers to FIIs for hedging their currency risk on the market value of entire investment in equity and/or debt in India as on a particular date.

Matter remanded if additions are made by TPO without working capital adjustments

October 21, 2012 1814 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee made a claim for working capital adjustment before the TPO. The TPO made a detailed analysis exhibiting how such an adjustment is to be granted. According to the assessee, the TPO made reference to Rule 10B(3) demonstrating comparability adjustment. On the strength of this Rule, the TPO opined that Indian transfer pricing provisions prescribed only reasonable accurate adjustment. He also pointed out that thereafter the TPO made reference to OECD Commentary and also the judicial precedents on comparability adjustment.

Carry forward business losses & depreciation cannot be set off against profits of an undertaking while working out claim u/s. 10B

October 21, 2012 3867 Views 0 comment Print

Since the provisions of section 10A and 10B are similar in nature and as the jurisdictional High Court decided the issue while considering the provisions of section 10B also respectfully following the above, we uphold the contention of assessee that carry forward business losses and depreciation cannot be set off to the profits of the undertaking while working the claim u/s 10B. Therefore, AO is directed to do the needful in light of the above principles laid down.

AO Can not change his opinion regarding need for special Audit unless new fact emerges

October 21, 2012 2111 Views 0 comment Print

It is necessary to examine the question whether it is open to the Assessing Officer, having already formed an opinion that no special audit was necessary, and not having communicated the same to the petitioner, to change his mind and form an opinion subsequently that a special audit is necessary having regard to the complexities of the accounts and the protection of the interests of the revenue.

If Trust conducts marathon in commercial manner, then it cannot be said to be existing only for charitable purposes

October 21, 2012 2845 Views 0 comment Print

The voluntary contribution received by a trust created only for charitable or religious purposes is to be deemed as income u/s. 11 of the Act. In case some of the objects of the trust are charitable and some of the objects can be termed as non charitable then such a trust will not be covered u/s. 12 because then it is not a trust created wholly for charitable purposes.

No Capital gain tax firm if it doesn’t distribute any capital asset to retiring partners

October 21, 2012 10638 Views 0 comment Print

Allocation of assets of the firm to the retiring partners is the basis for invocation of provisions of Section 45(4). In the case under consideration, neither there was any dissolution nor other event took place that had an effect of allocation of exclusive interest in any capital asset to the retiring partners. In these circumstances, FAA was justified in holding that conditions of Section 45(4) were not fulfilled. In our opinion the firm or the continuing partners were not liable to be taxed under the head ‘capital gains’,

Request of director for postponement of board meeting must be treated as leave of absence & not vacation of office

October 21, 2012 6046 Views 0 comment Print

It is a fact that the company holds three board meetings consecutively on March 31, 2011, June 9, 2011 and September 29, 2011. It is also a fact that the petitioner has challenged the validity of the board meeting dated March 31, 2011. Even otherwise, the petitioner has requested the company to postpone the meeting dated March 31, 2011 to April 2, 2011, at 11.00 a.m.

Vicarious liability of director of a private company for ‘tax due’ u/s. 179(1) from it does not extend to interest & penalty

October 21, 2012 13265 Views 0 comment Print

Section 179(1) provides for a vicarious liability of the director of a public company for payment of tax dues which cannot be recovered from the company. However, such liability could be avoided if the director proves that the non recovery cannot be attributed to any gross negligence, misfeasance or breach of duty on his part in relation to the affairs of the company.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930