Follow Us:

Archive: 2012

Posts in 2012

Services not in the course of business of manufacturing are not entitled to input credit

November 28, 2012 2737 Views 0 comment Print

After examining the records, I am of the view that the services in relation to Convention services, Memberships of Clubs & Association Services, Health Club & Fitness Centre Services and House Keeping services are not entitled for input service credit.

Service Tax Rules- Mostly used in practice

November 28, 2012 19934 Views 0 comment Print

RULE 4: REGISTRATION – Three categories of person liable to get themselves registered under service tax namely:-a. Service Provider of taxable services under section 69(1) b. Person responsible for making payment of service tax as specified in Rule 2 (1) (d) read with section 68. They shall also seek registration under section 69(1) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994

Conflict of Service Tax & Tax Deducted at Source

November 28, 2012 29455 Views 1 comment Print

Conflicts are what make legislation difficult to understand and subject to multiple views. Though we are always seeking for decision from judiciary to guide us in clear manner but the same might come much later than what we expect. There exists conflict for a transaction under various legal frameworks like:

Penalty can’t be deleted on transaction treated as sham

November 28, 2012 2220 Views 0 comment Print

If we take the view that a claim which is wholly untenable in law and has absolutely no foundation on which it could be made, the assessee would not be liable to imposition of penalty, even if he was not acting bonafide while making a claim of this nature, that would give a licence to unscrupulous assessees to make wholly untenable and unsustainable claims without there being any basis for making them

ICAI clarifies on Nagpur land Deal

November 28, 2012 3465 Views 0 comment Print

This Statement of Facts as regards Centre of Excellence (COE) project at Nagpur is being issued for the general information of members in view of the ongoing discussion in public domain.

No contravention of Rule 46A if CIT(A) sends document submitted by Assessee for Remand Report

November 28, 2012 7354 Views 0 comment Print

There is no cogency in the ground raised by the Revenue that Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) has not duly afforded adequate opportunity to the Assessing Officer to consider the submissions and evidences filed before him at the appellate stage. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) has duly sent the documents furnished by the assessee at the appellate stage to the Assessing Officer for a remand report.

Public Notice No. 32 (RE-2012)/2009-2014, Dated: 27.11.2012

November 27, 2012 568 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of powers conferred under Paragraph 2.4 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014, the Director General of Foreign Trade hereby makes the following amendments in Part B of Aayat Niryat Form – ANF 5B of the Handbook of Procedures, Vol.I, (Appendices and Aayat Niryat Forms).

SEBI : Inventory Management for Market Makers of SME Exchange/Platform

November 27, 2012 1579 Views 0 comment Print

SEBI vide circular dated April 26, 2010 has issued guidelines for market makers on stock exchange/trading platform by a recognized stock exchange having nationwide trading terminals for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs).

Addition based on mere statement of assessee recorded u/s. 132(4) not sustainable

November 27, 2012 2894 Views 0 comment Print

In the present case, the revenue authorities, sought to apply the statutory presumptions, as contemplated under section 132(4A) to the facts of the present case, without establishing the factum that the assessee was found in possession or control of any books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing etc. In this specific context, it is inconceivable and incomprehensible, as to how the provisions of section 132(4A) are applicable to the facts of the case, without showing satisfaction of the statutory conditions precedent contained therein.

Deduction u/s. 80-IB(iv) available where assessee was having many housing projects but ‘independence’ among them not proved

November 27, 2012 1909 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee admittedly was having only one homogenous business activity that was construction and selling of flats. No doubt, it was having five projects, but the question is whether each of the projects were forming part and parcel of one unit or part of one industrial undertaking.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930