Provisions of section 40(a)(i) as it existed prior to it’s amendment by Finance Act, 2003, with “effect from 1-4-2004 provided for disallowance of payment made to a non-resident only where tax is not deducted at source’ on such payment at source. A similar payment to a resident does not result in disallowance in the event of non-deduction of tax at source, Thus a non- resident left with a choice of dealing with’ a resident for a non-resident in business would opt to deal with a resident rather than anon-resident owing to the provisions of section 40(a)(i).
As regards allegation of Withdrawal of exemption from Import Duty, it has been submitted that import of medical equipment had taken place in 1990 and does not pertain to the period under discussion. The duty exemption was withdrawn citing certain noncompliance, assessee has filed appeal before CESTAT challenging the order of withdrawal and that the assessee has complied with all the terms for exemption. The matter is subjudice before the said Tribunal. However, the machineries imported are used by the Hospital namely remote control X-ray system and whole body C.T. Scan. The exemption is with respect to duty under Customs Act and does not make the assessee non-charitable. It continues to render medical relief.
In order to avoid the last-minute rush for customers paying their income-tax dues, the Reserve Bank on Friday said tax payers may use select branches of some public and private sector banks to remit their dues in advance. Some of the branches of State Bank of India, State Bank of Travancore, State Bank of Hyderabad, State Bank of Mysore, State Bank of Patiala, Allahabad Bank, Andhra Bank, Bank of India are authorized to accept payment of I-T dues either by cash or cheque, RBI said in a release.
ITAT Mumbai in this case was of the view that the perusal of AS 14 does not support the contention of the taxpayer that the investment by the taxpayer over the net assets taken over should be treated as goodwill. It was held that unless the fair valuation of assets, including any goodwill, is carried out and investment is earmarked towards purchase of goodwill, there is no question of apportioning any amount of consideration towards purchase of goodwill. The consideration in the form of cancellation of investments cannot be said to have been made for purchase of assets at book value, when the fair value of each asset and liability is much higher.
Company Law Board exercises very important functions under section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 providing relief to the shareholders against ‘oppression and mis-management’ in the Company. When a group of shareholders are oppressed in any company or the company is mis-managed causing loss to the interests of the shareholders, shareholders very frequently exercise the option of approaching the Company Law Board under section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 if they are qualified to do so under section 399.
Paragraph 8 of Article 5 of the DTAC provides that where an agent of an independent status to whom paragraph 9 does not apply, is acting in a Contracting State on behalf of an enterprise of the other contracting state, that enterprise shall be deemed to have a permanent establishment, notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 5, if it habitually exercise in that state an authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the enterprise or habitually secures orders in the first mentioned stage wholly or almost wholly for the enterprise itself or for the enterprise under the same common control.
The Civil Aviation sector includes Airports, Scheduled and Non-Scheduled domestic passenger airlines, Helicopter services/Seaplane services, Ground Handling Services, Maintenance and Repair organizations; Flying training institutes; and Technical training institutions.
Service tax legislation has been amended vigorously by Finance Act, 2012. One such amendment relates to the increase in number of services that shall be subject to reverse charge mechanism. The intention behind such restructuring is that it has been noticed that a number of registrants collect the tax but do not pay the same to the Department. This is a serious loss of the revenue even though the compliant section at the recipient end is often not benefitted. To ensure proper collection, while not inconveniencing small business, a new scheme is proposed to be introduced.
The Government has tabled a strong Lokpal Bill in Parliament which has features that are more progressive than in any Bill tabled before. This Bill has been prepared after extensive discussions with you and your colleagues and all suggestions that were considered to be feasible have been incorporated. This Bill has been passed by the Lok Sabha. Government is of the opinion that Parliament has to take a final view on the Bill and the passage of the Bill should be a Parliament-led process. To this end, Government is open to suggestions from all parties. In fact, many suggestions have been accepted by the Government in the course of the discussions on the Bill and two all-party meetings have been held in an effort to build consensus. The Bill has now been referred to a Select Committee which will be open to receive and examine all relevant suggestions.
India does not subscribe to the OECD model; hence, the commentary may have only persuasive value. However, it is needed to examine whether the India office was carrying on any essential and significant part of the activity in the scheme of business of the assessee. The Tribunal concurred with the decision of the case laws relied on by the assessee holding that where the RBI does not find any violation of an condition(s) imposed on its functioning, it shall be presumed to be carrying on preparatory or auxiliary activities until established otherwise. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the HC in the case of UAE Exchange Centre, where it was held that an LO cannot be construed as a PE unless its activities exceeds the permitted activities or the department is able to establish the contrary.
