Know Your Customer’ (KYC) Guidelines – Anti Money Laundering Standards (AML) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 – Obligations of NBFCs in terms of Rules notified thereunder’-Reporting Format under Project FINnet. Please refer to Master Circular No 231 dated July 1, 2011 on ‘Know Your Customer’ (KYC) Guidelines – Anti Money Laundering (AML) Standards. In terms of the extant instructions, NBFCs are required to report information/data relating to Cash and Suspicious Transactions to the Director, Financial Intelligence Unit-India (FIU-IND) in the prescribed format.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 75 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), sub-sections (2) and (2A) of section 37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), and section 93A read with sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), read with rules 3, 4 and 5 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995, the Central Government, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.68/2011-Customs(N.T.), dated the 22nd September, 2011 published vide number G.S.R. 712 (E) dated the 22nd September, 2011, retrospectively with effect from 1st day of October, 2011, namely:-
M/s Tally Solutions Private Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore for ITA No. 1235(Bang)/2010; AY- 2006- 07 Facts:– The taxpayer was engaged in the business of software development, marketing and sale of ‘tally’ branded financial accounting and management software. On 31 January, 2006 it sold its intellectual property rights including patent, copyrights and […]
Li & Fung (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)- ITA No. 5156/Del/2010] Tribunal ruling that the amount of compensation to be received ought to be a reflection of the functions performed, assets deployed and risks assumed by the associated enterprises (‘AE’) whilst discharging the business. On the concept of location savings the Tribunal held […]
Abhiram Seth Vs. JCIT (ITAT Delhi) Facts :- Abhiram Seth (the assessee) was employed in an executive position with M/s. PepsiCo India Holdings (P) Ltd., part of PepsiCo Inc.The assessee was granted valuable rights in shares of Pepsi Co Inc. Employees’ Stock Options [ESOP] held with Barry Group of Merrill Lynch [Trust], USA. Such rights […]
The applicant is a company incorporated under the laws of British Virgin Islands. It was previously known as ‘In touch Technologies Holdings Limited’, the predecessor of which in turn was ‘In Touch Technology Limited’. The applicant is engaged in the business of providing and enabling Electronic Payment Services via mobile and fixed line telecom and other telecom services networks. Over the years, the applicant has been conceiving, designing and developing Software Technology relating to payment processing platforms and services. In the year 1966, a new framework for an advanced intelligent processing platform was conceived of.
ORDER NO. 175 OF 2011 – The President is pleased to appoint the following officers of Indian Revenue Service (Income Tax) to the grade of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) purely on Ad hoe basis in the PB 3-Rs. 15,600-39, 100+7, 600/- with immediate effect and until further orders.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) today published for public comment a proposed amendment to IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards. The proposed amendment sets out how a first-time adopter would account for a government loan with a below-market rate of interest when they transition to IFRSs.
The IASB issued today an Interpretation clarifying the requirements for accounting for stripping costs in the production phase of a surface mine. The Interpretation was developed by the IFRS Interpretations Committee, the interpretative body of the IASB. The Interpretations Committee was asked to clarify when and how to account for stripping costs (the process of […]
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shila Datta & Ors (Supreme Court of India)- The Supreme Court last week widened the scope for insurance companies for resisting claims in road accident cases, especially on the amount of compensation.
