"August, 2011" Archive - Page 5

Income Tax Rates (For Individuals, HUFs, AOP, BOI) for A.Y. 2008-2009 and F.Y. 2007-2008 alongwith FBT rate chart

Income Tax Rates (For Individuals, HUFs, Association of Persons, Body of Individuals) ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 RELEVANT TO FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008 I TAX RATES FOR INDIVIDUALS OTHER THAN II & III Upto 1,10,000 – Nil 1,10,000 to 1,50,000 – 10% of the amount exceeding 1,10,000 1,50,000 to 2,50,000 – Rs.4,000 + 20% of ...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Service Tax on Assistance Provided For Processing Visa Applications

In respect of the issue as to whether service tax liability would arise on the assistance provided by visa facilitators, to individuals directly, for processing of visa applications, the CBEC has clarified vide CIRCULAR NO 137/6/2011-ST, Dated: April 20, 2011 that:...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Return of Income to Be Filed Electronically Under The Digital Signature

The Income Tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2011 are notified with effect from 1 July 2011 to provide that, a firm required to furnish the return of income in Form ITR-5, or an individual or Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) required to furnish the return of income in Form ITR-4 and to whom provisions of section 44AB of the Act are applicable, sha...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Exemption From Furnishing Return of Income In Respect of Certain Class Of Persons

An individual, whose total income for the relevant assessment year (AY) does not exceed Rs. 5,00,000 and consists of only income chargeable under Salary Income from other sources, by way of interest from a savings account in a bank, not exceeding Rs. 10,000...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax | ,

Whether royalty paid for use of brand names and trade marks is to be treated as capital expenditure?

CIT Vs V. R.V. Breweries & Bottling Industries Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

CIT Vs V. R.V. Breweries & Bottling Industries Ltd. (Delhi High Court)- The observation made in paragraph 58 at page 414 of the aforementioned judgement, on which reliance has been placed by the learned counsel for revenue seeks only to emphasise that the assessee in that case, had only acquired access to technology which was not related ...

Read More

Assessee liable to pay interest under s 234B and 234C on the tax payable on book profits computed under s 115J, notwithstanding the fact that it was a deemed profit

Bee Pee Jay Finance Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Central- II & Anr. (Calcutta High Court)

Bee Pee Jay Finance Ltd. Vs CIT and Anr (Calcutta High Court)- By virtue of Section 11 5JA a legal fiction has been created by which if total income is found to be less than 30% of the book profit, the total income should be deemed to be 30% of the profit and in such a case, if charge ability of interest under Sections 234B and 234C are h...

Read More

Computer peripherals entitled to depreciation at 60% and advertisement, ad film and website expenses are revenue in nature

CIT Vs Bonanza Portfolio Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

The expenditure was incurred by the assessee on ad films in respect of an ongoing business and there was no enduring benefit on the same. Hence, it was asses-sable as revenue expenditure, An expenditure incurred on advertisements and websites for sales promotion is revenue in nature. Computer peripherals are entitled to depreciation at 60...

Read More

The expression ‘may also be taxed’ used in Article 7 permits only the State of Source to tax such income and the State of Residence is precluded from taxing such income

DCIT Vs M/S. Essar Oil Limited (ITAT Mumbai)

DCIT Vs. M/S. Essar Oil Limited (ITAT Mumbai)- Whether the profits of Oman PE and the loss of Qatar PE of the taxpayer are to be excluded for tax purposes in India, as per Article 7 of respective DTAAs?...

Read More

CIT(A) cannot dismiss the assessee’s appeal without adjudicating upon the question as to whether the law to s 248, as amended with effect from 1 June 2007, was applicable or not

Jet Air Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)- XXXIII (ITAT Mumbai)

Jet Air (P) Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)- The matter was remitted to the CIT(A) for disposal afresh since the CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee’s appeal without adjudicating upon the question as to whether the law to s 248, as amended with effect from 1 June 2007, was applicable or not merely on the ground that it had never approached the ...

Read More

Merely because assessee does not produce copy of agreement to AO but does so before CIT(A), ITAT cannot delete relief granted by CIT(A)

Status Home and Enclaves (P) Ltd. Vs CIT (Calcutta High Court)

Status Home and Enclaves (P) Ltd. Vs CIT (Calcutta High Court)- Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in withdrawing the relief granted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) merely because the Development Agreement was not produced before the Assessing Officer when the said agreement was duly submitted before the considered by t...

Read More

Search Posts by Date

June 2021
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930