Insurance : Committee on Commercial Motor Third Party Liability Cover ORDER NO. IRDA/NL/ORD/MPL/212/12/2010, DATED 17-12-2010 1. Offering Motor third party liability cover to commercial vehicles has been a challenge for non-life insurers in view of the tariff controls prevailing and non availability of credible data and statutory provisions. The Authority, vide direction dated 4th December […]
The Income-Tax Department on Sunday conducted searches in over a dozen premises of an Ahmedabad-based real estate development firm for tax evasion. Over a dozen premises of Shaladia Construction were searched in Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar for tax
A person who was convicted for an offence and removed from service cannot claim backwages even if he was acquitted later, the Supreme Court ruled in the case, Corp Mithilesh vs Union of India. Merely because he is acquitted, he is not entitled to backwages and other consequential benefits, the court said.
Notification No.101/2010 – Customs (N.T.), New Delhi, dated the 22nd December, 2010. S.O. (E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem to exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on them Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin for the purposes of adjudicating the matters relating to Show Cause Notice issued to Shri R. Ramaraj,
The Supreme Court last week stated that goods and services hired for commercial purposes cannot be the subject matter of a consumer complaint under the Consumer Protection Act. It set aside the judgment of the National Consumer Commission in the case
G.S.R. 1002 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 21/2002-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2002, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i), vide number G.S.R.118 (E) dated the 1st March, 2002, namely:-
Cost Audit Branch under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs is manned by professionals drawn from the Indian Cost Accounts Service (ICAS) and primarily deals with sections 209 (1) (d) and 233B of the Companies Act, 1956. The Branch, under section 209 (1) (d) formulates & notifies Cost Accounting Records Rules (CARRs) for various industries. Such rules prescribe the manner in which cost records are to be maintained by specified class of companies. The Branch also undertakes rationalization of existing CARRs to reflect the changes in technology, manufacturing processes and accounting standards.
It is hereby informed that in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 233B of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), the Central Government has issued Orders to the effect that an audit of the cost accounting records maintained by the following companies be conducted for the year ending 31st March, 2011 and also for every financial year thereafter in respect of the products indicated there against:
The Office of the Director General of Investigation and Registration has been established under Section 8 of the Monopolies And Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for making investigations for the purposes of
In a reprieve to JetLite (formerly known as Sahara Airlines), a tax tribunal today set aside the revenue department’s demand of Rs 257 crore raised on the domestic airline for carrying advertisements of a group company on its tickets. The demand rais
