Follow Us:

Archive: 2008

Posts in 2008

Appliability of TDS provision on a transaction between two foreign companies

December 8, 2008 690 Views 0 comment Print

It is settled law that a writ cannot be entertained against a mere show-cause notice unless the Court is satisfied that the show cause notice was totally non est in the eye of law for absolute want of jurisdiction of the authority to even investigate into facts. The assessee has not been able to demonstrate absolute want of jurisdiction in the AO.

Notification No. 70 (RE-2008)/2004-2009, Dated: 08.12.2008

December 8, 2008 523 Views 0 comment Print

This Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2004-2009 (RE-2008), incorporating provisions relating to export and import of goods and services, shall come into force with effect from 1st April, 2008 and shall remain in force ‘till further amendments’ unless otherwise specified.

Allowability of Deduction U/s. 42 of Income Tax Act for Determining Book Profit u/s. 115JA

December 8, 2008 8592 Views 0 comment Print

Gujarat State Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. JCIT The deduction claimed by the assessee under section 42 cannot be considered for the purpose of computing the deemed income under section 115JA

Onus Is On Assessee To Prove That The Net Realizable Value Whatever Has Been Shown By Him Is The Correct Net Realizable Value

December 8, 2008 1739 Views 0 comment Print

Valuing the closing stock at net realizable value method is duly recognized by AS-2 issued by the ICAI but, the onus is on the assessee to prove that the net realizable value whatever has been shown by him is the correct net realizable value and is less than the cost: the assessee has to satisfy the Assessing Officer by adducing the evidence that the net realizable value is less than the cost. D. Subhashchandra & Co. v. ACIT

Applicable Period Of Limitation In Case Falling Under Section 275 (1)(C) Of It Act

December 8, 2008 11036 Views 0 comment Print

The period of limitation during which an order imposing a penalty can be passed in the case falling under section 275 (1)(c) would be a period of six months beginning from the end of the month in which the action for imposition of pending was initiated. The period of limitation during which an order imposing a penalty can be passed in the case falling under section 275 (1)(c) would be a period of six months beginning from the end of the month in which the action for imposition of pending was initiated.

Perquisite Value of Rent Free Accommodation

December 8, 2008 7885 Views 0 comment Print

ACIT v Makote Hoshizaki The perquisite value of rent free accommodation as per Rule 3 of Income-tax Rules, 1962 will be 20 per cent and not 10 per cent of the salary as reduced by the rent, if any, actually paid by the employer or the actual rent paid by the employer in case the premises are not owned by the employer whichever is lower.

Nature of Loss Suffered By a Share Broking Company in Trading Of Shares

December 8, 2008 2623 Views 0 comment Print

BLK Securities Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO The assessee company shall, for the purpose of section 73 of the IT Act, be deemed to be carrying on a speculation business to the extent to which its business consists of the purchase and sale of shares of other companies; thus, the loss incurred in purchase and sale of shares of other companies shall be deemed to be a speculation loss.

Consequence of Passing of an Assessment Order without Proper Enquiry

December 8, 2008 573 Views 0 comment Print

Thermal Systems (Hyd.) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT The failure of the Assessing Officer to record the reasons and to make enquiry with regard to the claim of the assessee makes the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue.

Notification No. 33/2008 – Service Tax, dated 07-12-2008

December 7, 2008 963 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 33/2008-Service Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of

Rescinds notification no. 116/2008 Custom Duty, dated 31st October, 2008

December 7, 2008 496 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), no. 116/2008, dated the 31st October, 2008, which was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 760(E) of the same date, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such rescission.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930