<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TaxGuru &#187; tax implications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taxguru.in/tag/tax-implications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taxguru.in</link>
	<description>Complete Tax Solution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Capital gain tax on Transfer of redevelopment rights?</title>
		<link>http://taxguru.in/income-tax-case-laws/capital-gain-tax-on-transfer-of-redevelopment-rights.html</link>
		<comments>http://taxguru.in/income-tax-case-laws/capital-gain-tax-on-transfer-of-redevelopment-rights.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CA Sandeep Kanoi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Case Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax implications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxguru.in/?p=17473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[# As per the Development Control Regulations of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, 1991 (‘DCR’), in the case of redevelopment of existing buildings, an additional FSI is granted tothe land owner.  The additional FSI can be utilised in the following manner:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taxguru.in/income-tax-case-laws/capital-gain-tax-on-transfer-of-redevelopment-rights.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transfer Pricing Management fees : Are you following the best practices? Part I</title>
		<link>http://taxguru.in/income-tax/management-fees-are-you-following-the-best-practices-part-i.html</link>
		<comments>http://taxguru.in/income-tax/management-fees-are-you-following-the-best-practices-part-i.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CA Sandeep Kanoi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indirect tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax authorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax implications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxguru.in/?p=16672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most widely contested issues by Indian tax authorities during a transfer pricing audit is the amount paid for intra-group services to group companies often referred to as management or intra-group fees/charges. In fact, compensation for intra-group services has been one of the important transfer pricing challenges globally for taxpayer and authorities alike.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taxguru.in/income-tax/management-fees-are-you-following-the-best-practices-part-i.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convergence with IRFS only after addressing concerns of the industry</title>
		<link>http://taxguru.in/finance/convergence-with-irfs-only-after-addressing-concerns-of-the-industry.html</link>
		<comments>http://taxguru.in/finance/convergence-with-irfs-only-after-addressing-concerns-of-the-industry.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CA Sandeep Kanoi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chartered accountants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax implications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxguru.in/?p=15602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making clear its commitment to converge Indian accounting norms with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by 2011, the government on Wednesday said all concerns of the industry would be addressed before convergence takes place. “We stand by our commitment to converge the Indian accounting norms with the IFRS and have synchronised the views of all stakeholders,” corporate affairs ministry secretary R Bandyopadhay said at a CII event.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taxguru.in/finance/convergence-with-irfs-only-after-addressing-concerns-of-the-industry.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax implications of ‘employee secondment’ contracts : ITAT Bangalore</title>
		<link>http://taxguru.in/income-tax-case-laws/tax-implications-of-%e2%80%98employee-secondment%e2%80%99-contracts-itat-bangalore.html</link>
		<comments>http://taxguru.in/income-tax-case-laws/tax-implications-of-%e2%80%98employee-secondment%e2%80%99-contracts-itat-bangalore.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CA Sandeep Kanoi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Case Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax implications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxguru.in/?p=3275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IDS Software Solutions vs. ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Where the assessee entered into a ‘secondment agreement’ with a US Company and obtained the services of an employee and the question arose whether the reimbursement by the assessee to the US Company of the salary paid by the US Company was chargeable to tax as “fees for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taxguru.in/income-tax-case-laws/tax-implications-of-%e2%80%98employee-secondment%e2%80%99-contracts-itat-bangalore.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramalinga Raju had 50 bank accounts in 2002</title>
		<link>http://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/ramalinga-raju-had-50-bank-accounts-in-2002.html</link>
		<comments>http://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/ramalinga-raju-had-50-bank-accounts-in-2002.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CA Sandeep Kanoi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CA CS ICWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax implications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxguru.in/?p=1459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Income Tax (I-T) department has recalled a 2002 investigation report against the promoters of Satyam that had details of a probe conducted by I-T sleuths on family members and associates of B Ramalinga Raju in Hyderabad. Not believing the confession of Raju that the company was left with no cash, and with investigations pointing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/ramalinga-raju-had-50-bank-accounts-in-2002.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

