Income Tax : Supreme Court clarifies Section 80HHC deduction for Export-Oriented Units, emphasizing that profits eligible for deduction must be...
Income Tax : In the last quarter of the financial year 2000-0 1, a serious controversy arose in the Income-Tax Department and export circles of...
Income Tax : In the present case, according to the Finance Minister presenting the Bill, a valid piece of legislation has been wrongly interpre...
Income Tax : The dispute concerned whether deduction under Section 80IB should be reduced by the amount already allowed under Section 80HHC. IT...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that taxable income was not properly computed where deduction under Section 80IB was reduced before cal...
Income Tax : The court examined whether reassessment could be initiated after four years based on existing records. It held that reopening foun...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment could be initiated after four years without fresh evidence. The court held such reopening inval...
Income Tax : The court held that electricity tariff for determining market value must include all components, including duty. It ruled that exc...
Supreme Court clarifies Section 80HHC deduction for Export-Oriented Units, emphasizing that profits eligible for deduction must be directly derived from the export of goods. Gain from foreign exchange fluctuations, in this case, ruled as not qualifying for deduction. Stay informed on crucial tax rulings.
Supreme Court held that profits earned on account of foreign exchange fluctuation cannot be included/ treated as derived from the business of export income. Accordingly, deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act not available.
Gujarat High Court held that Challenge to notice issued under section 154 of the Income Tax Act is maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
ITAT Jaipur held that reassessment of income under section 147 of the Income Tax Act other than income in respect of which AO has formed a reason to believe that the income has escaped assessment is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Mumbai held that technical know-how fee received by the assessee falls under the category of royalty as defined in Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act and hence is eligible for deduction u/s. 80-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Read about ITAT Mumbai’s decision in BA Continuum India Private Limited Vs. ITO regarding deduction u/s 10A of Income Tax Act before set-off of business loss and depreciation.
ITAT Mumbai held that the amount of internal transfer between two EOUs of the assessee is to be considered for the purpose of arriving at the profit eligible for exemption under section 10B of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jodhpur held that merely by transferring the reserve created out of the tax paid profit subsequently transferred to capital account of the firm is not a mistake apparent on record and cannot be rectified under the guise of provision of section 154 of the Act
ITAT Delhi held that income classified as ‘business income’ but not considered for the purpose of working of deduction u/s 80HHC merely on the nomenclature that income are not derived from export is unjustifiable as it is not justified that income has no nexus with earning of export.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards alleged bogus purchases unsustainable as cross examination of person based on which AO was drawing inferences was not allowed and payments were made through banking transactions.
