- Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 2:26
- Income Tax Case Laws
Roads, flyovers bridges etc., constructed and owned by an infrastructure company and utilised in its business of providing infrastructure is the tool of its trade and an essential adjunct to its business and not merely a setting in which the business is carried on and therefore, would constitute plant and will be entitled to depreciation at the rate of 25 per cent.
Full Article
- Thursday, December 31, 2009, 3:19
- Income Tax Case Laws
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Special Bench (SB) of Kolkata Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the case of Shree Capital Services Ltd. (Taxpayer) vs. ACIT (ITA No. 1294 (Kol) of 2008) in which the SB held that, prior to financial year 2005-06 (assessment year 2006-07), derivative transactions in shares were covered by the definition of speculative transactions (ST). The SB further held that the exception to the definition of ST, from tax year 2005..
Full Article
- Monday, December 21, 2009, 17:07
- Income Tax Case Laws
Recently, the Special Bench of the Kolkata Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) in the case of Shree Capital Services Ltd. v. ACIT (2009-TIOL-542-ITAT-KOL-SB) while dealing with a case prior to the amendment to section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) exempting derivative transaction as speculative in nature, held that the derivative transactions will be considered as speculative transaction under section 43(5) of the Act. Further, it was also held tha..
Full Article
- Monday, November 30, 2009, 2:34
- Income Tax Case Laws
After careful consideration of1 above provisions and facts and circumstances of the case, I am unable to accept the stand of the Revenue. As noted above actual cost should ordinarily mean real cost or real worth of assets. If it is not market value, then what is it? Mechanism to take W.D.V as provided in Explanation 2 to Section 43(6)(c) is not available in Explanation 3 \o auction 43(1). Further, assets whose actual cost is to be determined under Explanation 3 are secon..
Full Article
- Thursday, November 5, 2009, 3:04
- Income Tax Case Laws
By issuance of shares the assessee cannot be said to have incurred any expenditure and hence, issuance of shares in lieu of interest liability cannot be considered to have been payment towards expenditure.
Full Article
- Sunday, November 1, 2009, 9:23
- Income Tax Case Laws
As can be seen from the above the adjustment made by the assessee is according to the provisions of the Act. Since both the industrial galas fall within the block the WDV is increased by the actual cost of the asset falling within the block and reduced by the amount payable in respect of the asset sold. Accordingly we do not find any mistake in assessee's working of the block of assets which is according to the provisions of section 43(6)(c). The A.O.'s action in denying..
Full Article
- Sunday, October 25, 2009, 6:43
- Income Tax Case Laws
The word waiver does not fall into either of the three terms subsidy, grant and reimbursement used in Explanation 10 to section 43(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or proviso thereof; where plant and machinery were already existing prior to taking the loan, it could not be inferred that it was given to meet the cost of plant and machinery; once, the amount of loan waived by the lender, could not be related to purchase of plant and machinery, it could not be reduced from th..
Full Article
- Thursday, October 8, 2009, 2:33
- Income Tax Case Laws
Explanation – 5 to section 32 is clarificatory in nature and hence it will have retrospective operation. Accordingly, the depreciation cannot be taken as `notionally allowed', but only as `actually allowed'.
Full Article