- Friday, October 14, 2011, 21:11
- Income Tax
- 24 views
Hindustan Platinum Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) - Statement given u/s 131 cannot be the only basis for disallowing the claim of depreciation when it is shown with documentary evidence that the admission made in the statement recorded was under a mistake or misapprehension. Assessee is not entitled to claim loss u/s 28 on account bad debt of the advance given as inter corporate deposit without establishing the fact that it was a trade advance
Full Article
- Sunday, January 10, 2010, 13:36
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 7 views
Unfortunately, for the appellant NBFCs. are not covered by Section 36(l)(viia) of the I.T Act and so much so, explanation to section 36(l)(vii) squarely applies or in other words, the appellant-N. B.F.Cs. are not entitled to deduction of any Provision created for bad and doubtful debts, no matter such provision is created based on the guidelines issued by the R. B. I. Consequently, we uphold the order of the Tribunal and dismiss the Income-tax Appeals.
Full Article
- Monday, December 21, 2009, 2:26
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 87 views
The learned counsel for the assessee has vehemently argued that in this case interest from deposit was offered as business income and was also assessed as business income and therefore, automatically once it is assessed as business income then the same becomes eligible for deduction u/s.10B.
Full Article
- Sunday, December 6, 2009, 11:13
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 25 views
S. 80HHC; in favor of taxpayer: Post the amendment by Taxation Law Amendment Act, 2005 (effective from 1 April 1998), controversy had arisen as to whether in case of an exporter having export turnover of more than INR100 million (where generally conditions mentioned in section 80HHC cannot be satisfied), the entire sale proceeds of DEPB need to be excluded while calculating the deduction under Section 80HHC or only profit on transfer of DEPB should be excluded.
Full Article
- Friday, September 25, 2009, 2:30
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 56 views
SUMMARY OF CASE LAW Remission of a debt by the lender which was not claimed and allowed as a deduction to the borrower in any manner in any earlier previous year cannot be brought to tax either under section 41(1) or under section 28(iv) of Income-tax Act, 1961.
Full Article
- Monday, August 24, 2009, 16:20
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 69 views
SUMMARY OF CASE LAW Speculative transactions In case of a company, if part of its business consists of dealing in shares then all types of transactions, whether delivery based or non-delivery based, will be treated as speculative transactions.
Full Article
- Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:54
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 55 views
SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The waiver amount of term loan availed by the assessee does not partake the character of assessable income either under section 28(iv) or under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN, In The case of: Accelerated Freez & Drying Co. Ltd.V.DCIT, Appeal No.: ITA [...]
Full Article