- Thursday, December 24, 2009, 12:34
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 31 views
We have considered the rival submissions and also perused the relevant material on record. It is observed that the amount of liability in question in respect of TISCO written back by the assessee company in its accounts was treated by the authorities below as its income by applying the provisions of section 41(1). There is no dispute that the such liability represented the trading liability of the assessee and as declared by the assessee itself in the return of income, t..
Full Article
- Sunday, November 22, 2009, 13:34
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 13 views
unless an allowance or deduction has been made as per Income Tax Act and records, the same will not come under the sweep of Section 41(1). A return treated as non est and `invalid' can by no stretch of imagination be treated as allowance or deduction as per Income Tax Act and records.
Full Article
- Friday, September 25, 2009, 2:30
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 56 views
SUMMARY OF CASE LAW Remission of a debt by the lender which was not claimed and allowed as a deduction to the borrower in any manner in any earlier previous year cannot be brought to tax either under section 41(1) or under section 28(iv) of Income-tax Act, 1961.
Full Article