- Tuesday, December 29, 2009, 2:48
- Service Tax
- 14 views
Simply because some incidental activity of the assessee is revenue generating, does not provide any justification to hold that it is tainted with "commerciality" and reaches a point where relationship of mutuality ends and that of trading begins.
Full Article
- Sunday, November 1, 2009, 9:15
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 14 views
If the AO has cause or justification to know or suppose that income has escaped assessment it can be said to have a reason to believe that an income had escaped assessment; at the time of recording reasons for initiating proceedings u/s 147 it is not necessary that the Assessing Officer should have finally ascertained the fact by legal evidence or conclusion; at the initial stage what is required is `reason to believe' but no established fact of escapement of income.
Full Article
- Friday, July 31, 2009, 0:56
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 1,294 views
SUMMARY OF CASE LAW If an assessee has developed a housing project, wherein the majority of the residential units has a built-up area of less than 1500 sq.ft. i.e., the limit prescribed by section 80-IB(10) and only a few residential units are exceeding the built-up area of 1500 sq. ft., there would be no justification [...]
Full Article
- Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 0:22
- Company Law
- 84 views
The sum due as referred to under section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 must mean what has fructified and can not merely be a contingent liability or deferred payment; if the liability has not fructified within 21 days from the time the date of service of notice, it cannot be said to be a debt which company is unable to pay, in order that the Court could find a justification for winding up the company.
Full Article