- Wednesday, October 24, 2007, 11:03
- Income Tax
THE assessee company was incorporated with the main object of acquiring a holding of equity and preference shares of companies engaged in the business of cement, ready mix and aggregate and to provide financial management. It was the first return of the assessee company. The Assessing Officer noted that the total capital was at Rs.209.33 crores which was raised during this year, out of which a sum of Rs.207.78 crores was invested in the shares of Lafarge India Ltd. The a..
Full Article
- Wednesday, October 10, 2007, 7:40
- Income Tax
IT is now an axiomatic law that Board circulars are binding on the Department, even if they are wrong or against decisions of the Supreme Court. But our Boards do not have the habit of tracking down the multitude of circulars they issue and considering whether they are relevant after the Law has been amended and the Apex Court had already ruled on the issue. In the Dhiren Chemicals case (2002-TIOL-83- SC-CX), the Supreme Court had held that if there was a Board Circular ..
Full Article
- Friday, September 28, 2007, 4:51
- Income Tax Case Laws
IN the present case which was referred to the Third Member of the Tribunal, the dispute revolves around the issue of, whether interest u/s 201(1A) is payable on the ''usance interest'' from the date of payment or from the date of pronouncement of High Court decision in the Vijay Ship Breaking Corpn case
Full Article
- Friday, September 28, 2007, 4:47
- Income Tax Case Laws
Need for notice u/s 143(2) cannot be dispensed with in a case where AO proceeds to make inquiry for assessment, and determination of taxes payable after issuing notice u/s 143(1) as well - ITAT
Full Article
- Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 13:14
- Income Tax
"It is true that the Division Bench of the High Court has borrowed extensively from the orders of the Tribunal and the Commissioner and passed them off as if they were themselves the author's," noted the apex court. "We feel that quoting from an order of some authority particularly a specialised one cannot per se be faulted as this procedure can often help in making for brevity and precision, but we agree with Mr Vahanavati to the extent that any `borrowed words' used in..
Full Article
- Thursday, September 20, 2007, 7:00
- Income Tax Case Laws
IT all started with search and seizure operation conducted at the premises of Friends Portfolio. In the course of the search, statements of Shri Manoj Agarwal and other persons were recorded and thereafter assessment was completed in their cases. It was found that all the transactions undertaken by Shri Manoj Agarwal through Friends Portfolio and his other concerns were bogus transactions, in the nature of merely providing entries without any real physical transactions ..
Full Article
- Thursday, September 20, 2007, 6:53
- Income Tax
As no notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(2) in the present case as admitted by the AO himself in the remand report submitted to the learned CIT(A) as clearly mentioned by the learned CIT(A) in paragraph No. 17 on page 12 of his impugned order, the assessment order passed by him u/s 158BC suffered from a jurisdictional error and the same, therefore, was not valid in the eye of law.
Full Article
- Thursday, August 23, 2007, 15:05
- Income Tax Case Laws
Section 199 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deduction of tax at source - Credit for tax deducted - Assessment year 2003-04 - Whether Assessee will not be entitled to have benefit or credit for amount of tax deducted though mentioned in certificate for an assessment year, if income relatable to that amount is not shown and is not assessable in that assessment year - Held, yes - Whether therefore, if instead of entire income referable to amount of tax deducted, only a portio..
Full Article