ITAT Judgments - Page 5

A person can be both trader and investor in respect of shares

The ITO-33(2)(2) Vs. Smt. Kalpana Khandelwal (ITAT Mumbai)

It is a well settled proposition that the question as to whether a person has acted as a trader or as an investor in respect of share transactions, has to be decided on the basis of various factors listed out by the CBDT and Honourable Courts....

Read More

Sale of Leasehold Rights taxable and Section 50C applicable

Income Tax Officer Vs Sh. Chander Shekhar (ITAT Delhi)

Assessee was allotted a residential plot on 19.01.2004 in Sector-105, Noida through lottery on payment of allotment money of Rs.1,30,000/-. The total purchase price of the plot was Rs. 16,75,000/-. 2. The assessee on 28.02.2004 entered into an Agreement to sell in respect of this plot with M/s Rosebud Construction Pvt. Ltd through its Dir...

Read More

No S. 271(1)(c) penalty unless there is evidence beyond doubt of concealment

DDIT Vs M/s. Metapath Software International Ltd, (ITAT Delhi)

It is an well established proposition of law that being penal in nature, the provisions of section 271(1)(c) of the Act are invoked only when there is evidence beyond doubt that there was concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars thereof on the part of the assessee towards the tax alleged to be evaded....

Read More

Notice U/s. 153A issued without search is bad in law

ACIT Vs. K.G. Finvest Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

In the instant case, it is the assessment of person allegedly searched, which is disputed before us, unlike the notice issued for the assessment of `other person’ before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Even otherwise, the issue of invalidity of the search warrant in that case was not raised at any point of time prior to […]...

Read More

No Tax on Capital Gain earned by Singapore-Company on Sale of Debt Instrument in India under Article 13(4) of DTAA

Citicorp Investment Bank Vs DCIT (International Taxation) (ITAT Mumbai)

The ITAT Mumbai in Citicorp Investment Bank (Singapore) Ltd v. DCIT, held that the sale consideration received by a Singapore based Company on sale of debt instrument is not taxable as capital gain under the Income Tax Act in view of article 13(4) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)....

Read More

No disallowance for interest paid to NBFC without TDS deduction, considered by NBFC in their Income

Shri Azmath Ulla Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)

Having held that the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) shall have retrospective effect the question arises that if the recipients of interest in question have already considered the same for computing their income offered to tax then the dis allowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) is not attracted....

Read More

No Sec. 14A disallowance for shares held as stock in trade

D.C.I.T. Vs M/s. Kredent Brokerage Services (ITAT Kolkata)

Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT Vs GKK Capital Markets (P)Ltd 392 ITR 196 (Calcutta) has taken a view that the shares held as stock in trade and the expenses in relation to shares so held cannot be disallowed u/s 14A of the Act. In view of the aforesaid decision and the decision of the ITAT in assessee’s own case, we are of the v...

Read More

No penalty for delay in audit report submission due to late appointment of Auditor by Registrar of Societies

The A.P. Dairy Development Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income (ITAI Hyderabad)

Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income on the basis of the provisional accounts audited by a Chartered Accountant but did not file the audited accounts. The AO, therefore, issued a notice u/s 271D for levy of penalty for non filing of the audit report. The assessee explained […]...

Read More

Credit Society eligible for Sec. 80P deduction on Interest on idle fund

Primary Agriculture Credit Co-opeative Society Ltd Vs CIT (Appeals), (ITAT Bangalore)

When the amount which was deposited in the bank was not an amount due to members and it was not the liability of the society to the members then the interest earned from the deposits in the bank was held to be eligible for deduction under Section 80P (1) as well as 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act....

Read More

Remission under Deferral Sales Tax Scheme is Capital Receipt & not taxable

DCIT Vs ThyssenKrupp Electrical Steel India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune)

This amount represents difference between the amount payable as shown in the books of account under the sales tax deferral scheme of Government of Maharashtra, availed by the company and that paid under the Pre- payment scheme on the basis of Net Present value of the amount due, as pe...

Read More
Page 5 of 440« First...34567...102030...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,453)
Company Law (3,347)
Custom Duty (6,579)
DGFT (3,419)
Excise Duty (4,040)
Fema / RBI (3,237)
Finance (3,415)
Income Tax (24,908)
SEBI (2,721)
Service Tax (3,278)

Search Posts by Date

August 2017
« Jul