ITAT judgments

  • Jan
  • 23

Warranty provisions made on scientific & Reasonable basis is allowable

It is seen from the methodology that the assessee takes into account the warranty liability for the accounting period after bifurcating the likely cost on account of labour, material etc. The summary of the provision also shows that wherever excess provision was made in an earlier year, the same was reversed in the subsequent period.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 23

S.194H TDS not deductible on charges for of utilization of credit card facilities

Commission paid to the credit card companies cannot be considered as falling within the purview of S.194H. Even though the definition of the term commission or brokerage used in the said section is an inclusive definition, it is clear that the liability to make TDS under the said section arises only when a person acts behalf of another person.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 23

Sec. 50C not applicable to transfer of shares or indirect transfer of immovable property through share transfer

In the instant case, what transferred by the assessee are the shares in the company and not the land or building or both. Assessee does not have full ownership on the flats which are owned by the company. The transfer of shares was never a part of the assessment of the Stamp duty Authorities of the State Government.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 22

If ‘business income’ not taxable due to absence of PE in India, it cannot be taxed as ‘other income’

If a certain receipt cannot be taxed under any other head, only then the sections dealing with ‘Income from Other Sources’, come into play in domestic taxation matters. Likewise, under the DTAAs, if a sum can be taxed under any other Article, provisions of Article 22 will not be applicable. We are of the opinion, in light of the earlier decisions of the Mumbai Tribunal income received by the assessee-company form McKinsey India is not to be treated as Royalty-rather it has to assessed as business income as per Article 7 of the DTAA.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 22

No restriction in considering companies with either abnormal profits / losses as comparable to tested party, as long as they are functionally comparable

As far as the provisions of the Act are concerned, they lay down that the comparable companies should be functionally comparable to the tested party. There are no specific standards of comparability on the basis of abnormal profits or loss. Rule 10B(2) provides that the comparability of an international transaction with an uncontrolled transaction shall [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 22

S.32 Depreciation allowable on goodwill paid for Purchase of clientele base of sub-broker

Certain intangible assets on which depreciation could be claimed are – knowhow, patents, copy rights, trade marks, licenses, franchise or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature. This expression “any other business or commercial rights of similar nature” by itself would mean to include all kinds of commercial rights.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 22

Bad debt written off not allowable if weren’t considered while computing income of earlier years

As submitted by the DR if it is an expenditure incurred in respect of its business, it should have been claimed during the relevant assessment year and if it is a debt it should have been advanced in respect of trade or business of the assessee and it should have gone to computation of income of the assessee in the previous year in which the amount of such debt or part thereof is written off or of an earlier previous year or represents money lent in ordinary course of business.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 22

No TDs u/s. 194C if contract is for hiring of Lorries only and not for carriage of goods

In the case before the Kerala High Court, the question arose for consideration was whether a transport contract for mere carriage of goods without loading and unloading facility would amount to carrying out any work within the meaning of section 194C(1) of the Act.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 22

Block Assessment not sustainable if Notice u/s. 143(2) issued after expiry of prescribed period

Requirement of section 143 (2) cannot be dispensed with as it is mandatory and therefore, the notice under section 143 (2) issued after the expiry of prescribed period is an uncurable defect and consequently, the block assessment is erroneous and not sustainable.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 21

S. 92C(4) Deduction under Chapter VI-A cannot be allowed on additions made as per TPO’s order

From the proviso to Section 92C(4), it is evident that no deduction in Chapter VI-A is to be allowed in respect of the income which is enhanced after the computation of income in the said Section. Thus, the assessee is not entitled for deduction under Chapter VI-A in respect of the addition made as per [...]

Read the Full Article