high court judgments - Page 2

Interest Tax on interest on securities / head office investment a/c not applicable before 14.3.1995

CIT Vs M/s H.P. State Co-operative Bank Ltd (Himachal Pradesh High Court at Shimla)

Interest on securities and interest on head office investment account was made chargeable pursuant to Board’s instructions No. 1923 dated 14.3.1995 and as such, this Court sees no occasion for assessee Bank to declare same in its profit and loss account, wherein it had declared interest of Rs. 39.98 Crores, on approved securities for th...

Read More

Expense can be claimed despite stay against the same by court

National Agricultural Co- Operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. Vs CIT (Delhi High Court)

order which has been stayed would not be operative from the date of the passing of the stay order and it does not mean that the said order has been wiped out from existence....

Read More

FBT leviable on expense on Sales Promotion, Free Samples, Gift etc

Gujarat Chamber of Commerce & Industry Vs Union of India thro' secretary (Gujarat High Court)

When the language of Section 115WA and 115WB is clear and unambiguous and even the intention of the legislature while enacting sections 115WA and 115WB(2) is very clear i.e. with respect to the deemed fringe benefits, neither there is any scope for either literal and/ or purposive interpretation nor there is any occasion to consider the i...

Read More

Sec 40(a)(ia) amendment extending TDS payment due date U/s. 139(1) is Retrospective

The Commissioner of Income Tax­ Vs Shraddha & S S Kale, Joint Venture (Bombay High Court)

Amendment to Section 40 (a)(ia) of the Act by Finance Act, 2010 is retrospective with effect from 1st April, 2005 as held by various High Courts....

Read More

Demonitisation effect: HC condones delay in deposit of Court Fees

Prashant Sahu Vs Vijay Kumar Chourasiya (Madhya Pradesh High Court)

The complainant submits that because the complainant was to deposit the court fees, but due to financial insufficiency suffered by him, he could not make the deposit at the relevant time. It is also contended that during the said period, the Demonetisation was also in force, therefore, his non-deposit of the court fees be condoned and set...

Read More

UP VAT Registration cannot be denied for mere wrong Input Tax Credit claim

Sevak Enterprises Vs Commissioner, Commercial Tax (Allahabad High Court)

Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra of Allahabad High Court held that, wrongful claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) would not constitute sufficient ground for cancellation of registration of a dealer under UP Value Added Tax Act....

Read More

Assessee not allowed to appear with Counsel to Record Statement U/s. 108 of Customs Act

Pawan Kumar Pawan Arora Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)

In view of law laid down by Apex Court in case of Poolpandi & Others v. Superintendent, Central Excise & Others, presence of counsel refusal during interrogation/recording the statement of a person under Customs Act would not be violative of Article 20 (3) and 21 of Constitution of India....

Read More

Use of revisionary Power to delay DVAT Refund Claim is an Abuse of Power

Garg Roadlines Vs Commissioner Trade & Taxes (Delhi High Court)

There is sufficient indication from the notes on files that the invocation of the revisionary powers under Section 74A of the DVAT Act was to delay making the refund which was overdue for over six years. The Court is left no manner of doubt is that this was plainly an abuse of power vested in the Commissioner which calls for disapproval i...

Read More

No Penalty for non payment of service Tax if no willful suppression of facts to evade tax

Mahadev Logistics, Vs Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Court is of the considered opinion that there is no willful suppression of facts to evade tax on the part of the petitioner and it was bona fide on the part of the petitioner, it was not deliberate and in absence of finding relating to mensrea recorded by the Settlement Commission, the penalty imposed upon the petitioner under Section 78 ...

Read More

Custodian of Goods cannot deny his liability for export of Illicit Goods

M/s. Sanco Trans Ltd Vs The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Madras High Court)

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the assessee challenging an order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 15.6.2015 confirming imposition of penalty under section 114 of the Customs Act (in short Act) though reducing the quantum from Rs.5 lakhs to Rs.2.5 lakhs....

Read More
Page 2 of 35812345...102030...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,354)
Company Law (3,237)
Custom Duty (6,410)
DGFT (3,340)
Excise Duty (3,989)
Fema / RBI (3,152)
Finance (3,315)
Income Tax (24,358)
SEBI (2,658)
Service Tax (3,261)

Search Posts by Date

April 2017
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930