high court judgments

  • Apr
  • 17

S. 127 – Case should be transferred after giving personal hearing & reasons

We do not find substance in the submission of the Respondent-Revenue that there is no requirement to offer a personal hearing as the same was not asked for by the Petitioner. This court in the matter of Sahara Hospitality (supra) has held that it is mandatory wherever it is possible to do so on the [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 16

Cenvat Credit when intermediate product is exempt & Final Product is dutiable

Input services used in manufacture of exempted intermediate product is eligible for credit, if such intermediate product is used in manufacture of dutiable final product In the present case, ONGC is a manufacturer both of dutiable and exempted products. Crude oil as well as natural gases are exempted products. The Tribunal has held against the [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 16

Demand on covered issues cannot be recovered by adjustment of refunds -HC

The recovery of the demand on these three heads has to be stayed in view of a strong prima facie case being made out. The balance due and payable by the assessee would work out to Rs.159.49 crores. The assessee has under cover of its letter dated 28 March 2013 paid an amount of Rs.100 crores under protest.

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 15

Knowledge of assessee’s son is knowledge of assessee himself, No Condonation on the ground of Ignorance

It is clear, Section 85 provides that any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed by an adjudicating authority can prefer an appeal within three months. Thereafter, if the Commissioner is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal, the Commissioner can allow the appeal to be preferred within [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 15

Condition impossible to meet with cannot lead to denial of export rebate

If, having regard to the nature of the business and its peculiar features – which are not in dispute – the description, value and the amount of service tax and cess payable on input-services actually required to be used in providing the taxable service to be exported are not determinable prior to the date of [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 15

Company name can be restored to recover the amount of foreign arbitration award

Merely because a financial loss would be suffered by the appellant qua the arbitration Awards which had been passed against him would not entitle him to come under the exception seeking a refusal of the restoration of the company. The position of the company vis-à-vis this stand is that a healthy company who was admittedly [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 15

Winding up petition not to sustain if genuine dispute exist between the parties

In the present case, there were undoubtedly three separate contracts entered into between the parties. One was for the supply of cables and the other two for supply of accessories, i.e., Jumpers, Connectors and Surge Arrestors. Both the parties have been dealing with each other for over seven years. The Petitioner itself being the manufacturer [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 15

Mere rejection of Books of A/c and estimation of Profit cannot be ground for concealment penalty

Tribunal observed that no penalty can be imposed merely because account books of assessee were rejected and that profit was estimated on the basis of fair gross profit ratio. With respect to retention of the portion of the sales tax, the Tribunal stated that no evidence was brought by the Revenue to suggest that assessee [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 15

S. 269SS not applies to cash loan taken by Partner from firm

Issue – The assessee had taken the amounts from four firms which were found to be in cash and the Assessing Officer has considered these payments were in violation of Section 269SS of the Act. Stand of assessee is that the amounts were taken in his capacity as partner and it cannot be taken as [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Apr
  • 15

Additions cannot be deleted for a rectifiable mistake in one line of order

After going through the assessment order, annexure-1, we are of the considered opinion that the assessee may have submitted his returns showing his total income as ‘NIL’ and has shown book profit of Rs. 2,05,86,930/- under Section 115JB but A.O. has not proceeded to consider the case of the petitioner under Section 115JB and clearly [...]

Read the Full Article