- Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 11:39
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 101 views
On merits, s. 32(1)(ii) allows depreciation in respect of know-how, patent, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature. The term “commercial rights” are such rights which are obtained for effectively carrying on business and commerce. “Commerce” is a wide term which encompasses many a facet. Accordingly, any right obtained for carrying on business with effectiveness comes within the sweep of meaning o..
Full Article
- Thursday, December 2, 2010, 8:53
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 17 views
ITAT Mumbai held in above case that that since there was no sale, discarding, demolition or destruction of an asset, no adjustment can be made to the Written Down Value (WDV) of the block of assets. Accordingly, the depreciation on goodwill and non-compete fees has to be allowed since these assets already formed part of the block of assets.
Full Article
- Friday, November 19, 2010, 8:36
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 15 views
:Bangalore bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) in the case of Bosch Ltd. v. CIT [2009-TIOL-736-ITAT-BANG]held that the taxpayer company was entitled to claim depreciation on the skill and the know-how brought by the employees of the transferee company classified as ‘business information’ under the category of ‘other identifiable intangibles’ (goodwill) under section 32(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
Full Article
- Saturday, October 9, 2010, 7:29
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 3 views
A 3 Member Special Bench was constituted to decide whether the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation u/s 32 on intangible assets termed ‘Goodwill’. At the hearing, the assessee raised a preliminary objection that as the Judicial Member on the Special Bench has already taken a view about allowability of depreciation on goodwill in the case of Bharatbhai J. Vyas vs. ITO 97 ITD 248 (Ahd.) judicial discipline requires that this Special Bench should consist of perso..
Full Article
- Friday, January 8, 2010, 2:34
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 54 views
This is a very interesting ruling where the difference between the goodwill and the trade mark has been brought out clearly. The Tribunal has observed that the trademark can be transferred separately, either with or without the goodwill of the business whereas goodwill cannot be sold without the business itself and therefore transfer of trademark cannot be regarded as transfer of goodwill.
Full Article
- Thursday, December 31, 2009, 14:54
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 25 views
Necessity of establishing goodwill and reputation, that too in a finance company, is of utmost necessity; at same time, it cannot give a permanent license to the company to continue to violate the provisions of section 269SS/269T.
Full Article
- Monday, December 21, 2009, 16:58
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 25 views
The Bangalore Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) in recent case of Associated Electronic & Electrical Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2009-TIOL-263- ITAT-BANG) held that transfer of trade mark is not transfer of goodwill as the goodwill of a business cannot be sold without selling business itself. Thus, the trade mark and goodwill are two different assets. Further, since the capital gains on sale of trade mark came into effect from 1 April 2002 there was no capi..
Full Article
- Thursday, October 22, 2009, 2:22
- Income Tax
- 9 views
Even if an asset is described as goodwill but it fits in the description of section 32(1)(ii), depreciation is to be granted on the same; the true basis of depreciation allowance is the character of the asset and not it's description.
Full Article