- Monday, October 10, 2011, 6:51
- Income Tax
- 995 views
Section 69 does not provide any guideline about the extent and length of the discretionary power given to AO in the matter of treating the investment as income which is unexplained or unsatisfactorily explained by the investor-assessee. Therefore, Assessing Officer is expected to appreciate the reasonable explanation offered to him, the evidences produced before him about the nature and source of investment and he can not make the addition merely on surmises, conjectures..
Full Article
- Thursday, January 28, 2010, 7:10
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 23 views
Delhi High Court in the case of Messe Dusseldorf India Pvt. Ltd. (Taxpayer) [2010-TIOL- 74-HC-DEL-IT] dismissing a writ petition, held that in cases where a taxpayer has not been provided an opportunity of being heard by the Transfer Pricing Officer, the taxpayer is entitled to raise all objections and furnish necessary evidence to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The DRP has to pass speaking order after taking into consideration the objections filed and evidences fur..
Full Article
- Monday, January 4, 2010, 16:23
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 44 views
On careful consideration of relevant facts, I am of the view that important fact stated by the assessee in his reply to penalty notice has not been considered in accordance with law. The revenue authority and the Tribunal in the quantum proceedings proceeded mainly on a presumption that the payment was made through account payee cheque, decided the issue against the assessee and the expenditure claimed was disallowed and added to the income of the assessee. In the penalt..
Full Article
- Thursday, December 31, 2009, 14:56
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 18 views
The failure of the persons to appear before the AO for examination in assessment proceedings or remand proceedings tilts the scales in favour of the revenue for giving a finding that the gifts were not genuine.
Full Article
- Thursday, December 31, 2009, 14:41
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 47 views
It would depend upon facts of each case whether all the three ingredients to discharge the onus to prove cash credit have been proved by the assessee or not; if an NRI, engaged in business of real estate development with substantial means, decided to invest in real estate in India, genuineness of same cannot be doubted unless there is any evidence to contrary.
Full Article
- Tuesday, December 29, 2009, 2:30
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 13 views
The burden of proving an understatement or concealment is on the revenue; this burden may be discharged by the revenue by establishing facts and circumstances from which a reasonable inference can be drawn that the assessee has not correctly declared or disclosed the consideration received by him and there is an understatement or concealment of the consideration in respect of the transfer.
Full Article
- Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 1:14
- Income Tax
- 19 views
All taxpayers are assessed u/s.143, u/s.147, u/s.148 and u/s.153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. After filing of return, when an asses see is being assessed by an Assessing Officer, he/she is required to file his/her submissions before the respective authority during the course of assessment. All these assessments are popularly known as ‘Scrutiny’ assessments. In case of these assessments, the authority before whom these proceedings are going on is supposed to form his ..
Full Article
- Sunday, October 25, 2009, 6:00
- Service Tax
- 776 views
In this article we are describing all the features of Service Tax section like: filing of ST-1, getting of ST-2 and filing of ST-3. Again, as it is not possible to compile all the things in one article, we will give details for filing ER-1 return other returns in our next articles on the same issues at the earliest.
Full Article