- Sunday, October 3, 2010, 9:45
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 10 views
The Bombay High Court has directed the income tax commissioner to reconsider the applications of Bollywood actor Danny Denzongpa alias Tshering Pintso for tax exemptions on dividends and interests since 1997-98 under section 10(26AAA) as incorporated in the Finance Act, which entitled tax exemptions to Sikkimese nationals on dividends and interest on securities. A division bench of the high court has set aside the order passed by the income-tax commissioner rejecting nin..
Full Article
- Monday, January 4, 2010, 16:21
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 15 views
Merely because income/loss in dealing in shares in one particular year is more than income/loss from principal business of the assessee of granting loans and advances, it cannot be said that principal business of assessee is not that of granting loans and advances.
Full Article
- Thursday, December 31, 2009, 3:28
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 18 views
The Taxpayer incurred interest expenditure on the funds borrowed for investing in shares of a company, with a view to acquire controlling interest. The ITAT held that the interest expenditure incurred is not allowable under Section 57(iii)(Section) of the Indian Tax Law (ITL), since it is not incurred 'wholly and exclusively' for the purpose of earning dividend income.
Full Article
- Saturday, December 19, 2009, 16:16
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 9 views
The Bombay High Court ruled that once the taxpayer’s submissions with respect to section 14A was accepted by a tax officer, the Tribunal cannot send back the same matter for the tax officer’s re¬consideration. Recently, the Bombay High Court in the case of Topstar Mercantile Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2009-TIOL-458-HC-MUM-IT) has held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) was not justified in sending back the matter to Assessing Officer (AO) to consider the ..
Full Article
- Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 3:04
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 19 views
Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in the case of Cheminvest Ltd. (ITA Nos.87Del//2008, 4788/Del/2007 and 233/Ahd/ 2006) holds that expenditure relating to exempt income to be disallowed even if assessee has not earned any tax-free income.
Full Article
- Sunday, December 6, 2009, 11:42
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 156 views
Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi holds that expenditure relating to exempt income to be disallowed even if assessee has not earned any tax-free income.
Full Article
- Sunday, December 6, 2009, 11:07
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 13 views
S. 271(1)(c); in favor of taxpayer : The taxpayer was a trust organized in the US and was a resident of the US. As regards India, it was registered with SEBI as a sub- account of M/s Fidelity Management Resources Co. It filed a return of income declaring short-term capital gains and dividend income. Thereafter, based on an AAR ruling in case of XZY/ABC Equity Fund (2005) (250 ITR 194), the taxpayer filed a revised return of income,
Full Article
- Saturday, November 28, 2009, 1:07
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 5 views
Interest paid on funds borrowed for acquiring controlling stake in a company will not be exempt from tax. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that such expenditure for investing in shares of a company cannot be exempted, since it has not been incurred ‘wholly and exclusively’ for the purpose of earning dividend income.
Full Article