CAPITAL GAIN

  • Mar
  • 16

Advance received against sale of land is not taxable in the year of receipt

No agreement has been signed in this year. The possession has also not been delivered in this year. The twin conditions of execution of written agreement and handing over of the possession have to be cumulatively satisfied in order to bring the case within the ambit of section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A of the [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 04

Income-tax on buyback of shares by unlisted companies

Under the existing provisions of the income-tax law, transfer of shares in an Indian company by a shareholder (which includes buy-back of shares under section 77A of the Companies Act, 1956) is subject to tax under the head capital gains.

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 28

Amendment in definition of Capital Asset – Agricultural Land

The existing provisions contained in clause (14) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act define the term “capital asset” as property of any kind held by an assessee, whether or not connected with his business or profession. Certain categories of properties including agricultural land have been excluded from this definition. Sub-clause (iii) of clause (14) [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 22

Income from relinquishment of right in property is capital gain

The decision in J.K. Kashyap v. Asstt. CIT [2008] 302 ITR 255 is an authority for the proposition that even when an assessee becomes entitled to an undefined and undivided share in a property, through an agreement, which he later relinquishes, the gain has to be assessed as income from capital gain, and not as [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 21

Agricultural Land is not Capital Asset if not within notified area & no capital gain on transfer of such land

The agricultural land situated in areas lying within a distance not exceeding 8 kms. from the local limits of Municipalities or Cantonment Boards are covered by the amended definition of ‘capital asset’, if such areas are, having regard to the extent of and scope for their urbanization and other relevant considerations, is notified by the [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 31

Amalgamation not comes within scope of transfer u/s. 2(47)

Amalgamation does not come within the scope of ‘transfer’ as defined in Section 2(47) of the Act and such being the view taken not only by this court, but Madras High Court and also the Supreme Court, there is no question of holding that the assessee disentitles the benefit of Section 80-I of the Act.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 30

Exemption U/s. 54EC available on STCG calculated u/s. 50 on sale of depreciable assets held for more than 36 months

In case of transfer of capital asset forming part of block of assets in respect of which depreciation has been allowed, mode of computation and cost of acquisition shall be as per modifications provided in section 50. Thus, special provision made for computation of capital assets in respect of which depreciation has been allowed, is confined for the purpose of section 50 in relation to sections 48 and 49 only.

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 20

Cost of lease-hold land can’t be taken as NIL as same is not covered by sec. 55(2)(a)

The provision of section 55(2)(a) shall apply in relation to the capital assets mentioned in section 55(2)(a) of the Act only. The capital assets as mentioned in section 55(2)(a) are exhaustive and all inclusive of capital assets, such as goodwill, trade mark brand name, right to manufacture, produce or process any article or thing or [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Jan
  • 14

Useful tips to save Income Tax in F.Y. 2012-13

Income from Salary:-Section 17 of the Income Tax (IT) Act is all about taxation under the head ‘salary’. In most of the cases, it is impossible for a salaried person to avoid tax on his income, except by way of deduction under chapter VI A of the IT Act.

Read the Full Article

  • Dec
  • 11

Relinquishment of tenancy right not chargeable to capital gain tax for A.Y. 1986-87, if Cost cannot be ascertained

In the background of above legal position, we have to ascertain from the facts on record whether it is possible to ascertain the cost of acquisition of the tenancy rights. We may recall that the assessee and the landlord entered into an agreement under which, the landlord agreed to rent out four existing floors to the assessee, and for three more under construction floors of the building,

Read the Full Article