- Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 22:23
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 7 views
In AY 2002-03, the assessee suffered a long-term capital loss. U/s 74(1) as it then stood, such loss could be carried forward and set off against all capital gains including short-term capital gains. S. 74 was amended in AY 2003-04 to provide that long-term capital loss could only be set-off against long-term capital gains and not against short-term-capital gain. When the assessee claimed a set-off in AY 2004-05 the question arose whether the amended law should apply or ..
Full Article
- Wednesday, November 18, 2009, 3:12
- Income Tax
- 6 views
All that could happen, by allowing proceedings to continue, was that the assessing officer might pass an order of assessment or re-assessment. The petitioner would then have a spate of statutory remedies. The judge who heard a writ petition from the Chennai-based Jayaram Paper Mills Ltd challenging a notice of July 7, 2008 issued by Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Company Circle II(3), Chennai, for AY 2004-05 ruled that the reason recorded by second respondent (ACI..
Full Article
- Thursday, October 8, 2009, 2:07
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 12 views
Section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Appellate Tribunal - Powers of - Assessment year 1996-97 -Whether though Tribunal is not akin to a Court but functions discharged by it are similar to a Court, and, hence, in addition to its expressed statutory powers it has got inherent power to pass such orders as may be necessary for ends of justice - Held, yes -
Full Article
- Saturday, August 15, 2009, 9:02
- Income Tax
- 222 views
Set-off & Carry Forward of losses [Sections 58 to 60] Income from various sources falling within any head of income shall be set-off. Income / Loss from Capital Gains can be set-off against Loss / Income from any other head of income (from Ordinary Sources), since the differential tax rates in respect of income from [...]
Full Article
- Thursday, November 13, 2008, 17:07
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 3 views
CIT vs Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd.- Business loss: Business expenditure - Notional Liability: Loss due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates The assessee had borrowed funds in foreign exchange for the purpose of capital outlay. No liability for repayment of loan was quantified nor any payment was made. The notional liability on account of change in exchange rates could not be allowed on notional basis, nor this could be taken into account for determining actual ..
Full Article
- Friday, October 31, 2008, 14:05
- Income Tax
- 28 views
IT is turning out to be a double whammy of sorts for companies that have taken a hit on account of mark-to-market (MTM) losses due to their exposure to forex derivatives. These companies may find it difficult to convince the income tax (I-T) department to allow MTM losses as deduction. Sources in the I-T department pointed out that there are no specific provisions in the Income Tax Act dealing with this issue. Moreover, there are no precedents or case laws that clearly ..
Full Article
- Friday, January 25, 2008, 11:12
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 8 views
In the return of income, the assessee claimed deduction u/s 80HHE before setting off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation from the gross total income. Before the Assessing Officer it was contended that section 80HHE is the self-contained section and contains the definition of profits of the business, export turnover, total turnover etc. Section 80AB refers to the nature of income entitled for deduction u/s VIA and include in the gross total income..
Full Article
- Thursday, December 20, 2007, 12:23
- Income Tax
- 51 views
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Claridges Investments & Finances (P.) Ltd. - Section 14A, read with section 10(33), of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in total income - Assessment year 2001-02 - Whether provisions of section 14A apply only when there is expenditure in relation to an exempt income and it does not create any legal fiction to deem any expenditure as expenditure incurred in relation to exempt incom..
Full Article