Assessment

  • Mar
  • 22

The provision for a liability is amenable to a deduction if there is a reasonable element of certainty that it shall be incurred and can be estimated: Delhi HC

CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: HIGH COURT OF DELHI In The case of: CIT v Insilco Limited APPeal No. : ITA NO. 873/2008 & 1156/2008 Decided on: FEBRUARY 27, 2009 SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The provision for a liability is amenable to a deduction if there is an element of certaintly that it shall be [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 22

In case of gift from NRI not related to Assessee ,onus is on the Assessee to substantiate the claim of genuine gifts: ITAT, Mumbai

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The gift transactions involving the unrelated NRI persons as donors are always a matter of dispute between revenue and the assessee; the aspects of identity of the donor, creditworthiness of the donor and the genuineness of the transaction become relevant simply because as to why or what reason an unrelated person [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 22

Time limit prescribed for issuance of notice under section 143(2)(i) or 143(2)(ii) of IT Act : ITAT Mumbai

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The provisions of section 143(2) are clear regarding the issuance of notice for both types of scrutinies independently and limit has also been prescribed for issuance of notice under section 143(2) for both types of scrutiny proceedings; hence, notice issued under section 143(2)(i) cannot by itself extend the time for the [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 16

Pyramid Saimira to challenge I-T dept in court on Monday for against the IT dept. decision to attach bank a/c

Leading theatre chain Pyramid Saimira will move court on Monday against the Income-Tax department’s decision to attach the company’s over Rs 240 crore bank accounts for alleged non-payment of tax. “We will file a case against the Income-Tax department at the Madras High Court on Monday,” a company source told PTI. On Friday, the tax [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 16

Time Limit of section 149 (3) not applicable to voluntary agents: ITAT Mumbai Special Bench

J. M. Baxi vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai Special Bench) Where the assessee suo motu filed returns as “agent” of a non-resident but no assessment was made and after the expiry of two years from the end of the assessment year a notice under section 148 of the Act seeking to assess the income and the [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 11

Assessment of agent of non-resident, Option is with Income Tax Authorities: ITAT Mumbai

CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, SPECIAL BENCH `L’ MUMBAI In The case of: J. M. Baxi & Co. v. DDIT (Int’l Taxation) Appeal No.: ITA No. 2965 to 2968/M/06 Decided on: March 5, 2009 SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The option is with the Income-tax Authorities and not with the non-resident or his agent to [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 11

Specification of agricultural lands which fall outside scope of “capital asset”

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The municipality being talked about in both sections, i.e. section 2(14)(iii)(a) as well as section 2(14)(iii)(b) of IT Act, is one and the same, i.e., one and only one municipality; therefore, if the Central Government specifies, by notification in the official Gazette, any area as an area falling outside the local [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 11

Setting off of unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years against income of subsequent year under section 10A of IT Act is not admissable

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The unabsorbed depreciation for the assessment years 1993-94 to 1995-96 pertains to the period ended before 1-4-2001 and the same could not be set off against the income of the assessment year for 2003-04 as per section 10A(6). CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, `F’ BENCH, NEW DLEHI In The case [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 11

While computing Income from House Property only deductions as enumerated under section 24 is admissable

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The assessee is entitled to claim only the deductions as enumerated under section 24 in computation of its income assessable under section 22. CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, AHMEDABAD BENCH `D’, AHMEDABAD In The case of: J. B. Patel & Co. v. DCIT Decided on: February 29, 2008 RELEVANT EXTRACTS: [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 10

Internal Auditor cannot be tax auditor – Further Clarification by ICAI

The Council in its 281st meeting held from 3rd to 5th October, 2008 decided that an internal auditor of an assessee, whether working with the organization or an independently practicing Chartered Accountant being an individual chartered accountants or a firm of chartered accountants, could not be appointed as his tax auditor. The said decision came [...]

Read the Full Article