Assessment

  • Mar
  • 03

AAR on admissibility of an application when same is hit by embargoes laid down by section 245R of IT Act

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW Once the conclusion is reached that the application for advance ruling filed under section 245Q is hit by one or all of the embargoes laid down in the proviso to section 245R(2), the Authority  has no option but to reject the application in limine; it is not open to the Authority [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Mar
  • 03

Increase in turnover cannot be the sole criteria for steep increase in remuneration payable to director

CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, PUNE BENCH `B’, PUNE In The case of: Shree Laxmi Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v.  ACIT Appeal No. : ITA No. 1657/PN/2004 Decided on: January 31, 2008 SUMMARY OF CASE LAW An employer, in fixing the remuneration of his employees, would consider the extent of his business, the nature of [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 28

Enquiry to be made by AO under section 40A (2) (a) of IT Act in case payment of remuneration to director is excessive or unreasonable

CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur (Third Member) In The case of: Jagdamba Rollers Flour Mills Ltd. v. ACIT Appeal No. : ITA No. 93/Nag/2007 Decided on: October 27, 2008 SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The scope of enquiry under the provision of section 40A(2)(a) is with reference to the fair market value [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 28

CBI detains I-T officer T V Mohanfor graft & Serched Additional comm. of IT, S M Keshkamat

The CBI and the income tax department are at loggerheads. The reason is the effect of a trap laid by the CBI to catch an income tax officer, T V Mohan who was allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs 4.5 lakh from the chartered accountant of a real estate agent. Mohan was detained on Thursday [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 26

Taxman gears up to move apex court on its tax claims of around Rs 2,000 crore

The Income Tax department is all set to move the Supreme Court for a final judgement on its tax claims of around Rs 2,000 crore (Rs 20 billion) in cases involving dividend stripping prior to 2002-03. The taxman had lost the case in the Bombay high court last year. Though the government in 2005 put [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 25

Bangalore IT park defrauds Rs 75.8cr to Income Tax Department

On paper, this tech park had 37 units functioning on its premises — all entitled to income tax concessions. What they turned out to be were nothing less than maintenance rooms located in the car park! And the tech park owner stashed away Rs 75.8 crore that he had claimed as tax concessions for three [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 25

Date which is material and relevant for purposes of computing limitation period in certain cases under IT Act

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The date of receipt of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be, by the Chief Commissioner or the Commissioner, as the case may be, is material and relevant for the purposes (i) filing an appeal to the Tribunal by the Commissioner against the [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 25

Computation of depreciation in cases covered by Rule 8 of Income Tax Rules, 1962

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW In cases where Rule 8 applies, the income which is brought to tax as “business income” is only 40 per cent of the composite income and consequently, proportionate depreciation is required to be taken into account because that is the depreciation “actually allowed”. CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: SUPREME COURT OF [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 23

Assessment of income from running of business centre

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW   Whether a receipt is a business receipt or a receipt from mere letting out of an immovable property would depend on the facts of the case; if the primary object is to exploit the property by `complex’ commercial activities, then income from the same should be considered as business income. [...]

Read the Full Article

  • Feb
  • 23

Treatment to be given to income from delivery based share transactions

Gopal Purohit v. JCIT- The delivery based transaction should be treated as of the nature of investment transactions and profit there from should be treated as short-term capital gain or long term capital gain depending upon the period of holding; employment of an infrastructure so as to keep a track of the developments in the share market cannot turn an investment activity into a business activity.

Read the Full Article