- Wednesday, December 2, 2009, 16:46
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 23 views
The assessee filed a revision petition u/s 264 in which it claimed that the subsidy received by it from the government was a capital receipt and not chargeable to tax in view of P.J. Chemicals Ltd 210 ITR 830 (SC). The Petition was allowed by the CIT. Subsequently, the Supreme Court held in Sahney Steel and Press Works 228 ITR 253 that the subsidy received by that assessee was a revenue receipt. Pursuant to this judgement, the CIT passed a rectification order u/s 154 by ..
Full Article
- Friday, July 17, 2009, 1:26
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 10 views
SUMMARY OF CASE LAW An order of assessment passed by an ITO should not be interfered with only because another view is possible; when a statute provides for different hierarchies, providing for forums in relation to passing of an order as also appellate or original order; by no stretch of imagination a higher authority can [...]
Full Article