- Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 22:16
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 23 views
In CIT vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd. 256 ITR 1 the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court was considering a case of reopening u/s 147 within 4 years from the end of the assessment year. The Court held that when a regular order of assessment is passed in terms of section 143 (3) of the Act, a presumption can be raised that such an order has been passed on application of mind.
Full Article
- Sunday, January 10, 2010, 13:31
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 897 views
It shows that these assessees had really intended to comply with the notices and therefore it should not be inferred that there was a default which could invite penalty u/s 271(l)(b). The ITAT Delhi Bench-G in the case of Akhil Bhartiya Prathmik Shikshak Sangh Bhawan Trust vs. Assistant Director of Income-tax (2008) 115 TTJ (Delhi) 419 has held that if assessment order is passed u/s 143(3), and not u/s 144 then non-compliance is deemed to have been waived.
Full Article
- Monday, January 4, 2010, 16:04
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 13 views
When the AO has reopened the same very issue which is under revision and has examined all the details and after verifying and being satisfied, has taken a plausible view, how can his order be treated as erroneous simply because in his order, he has not made elaborate discussion with reference to his satisfaction.
Full Article
- Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 2:16
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 175 views
Section 271(1)(c) provides that if the AO or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner, in the course of proceedings in this Act is satisfied that any person has concealed the particulars of his income or furnish inaccurate particulars of income, he may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty a sum which shall not be less than but which shall not exceed three times the amount of tax sought to be evaded by a reason of the concealme
Full Article
- Sunday, August 12, 2007, 6:04
- Income Tax
- 25 views
starting from April 1, 2008, the deductors of TDS are not required to give TDS certificates to the recipients of income or payment in respect of which tax has been deducted. It is one thing to abolish the requirement to attach TDS certificates with the returns filed by the taxpayers but quite another to abolish the very requirement of furnishing TDS certificates to the recipients of income because it can cause considerable inconvenience to them.
Full Article