- Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 10:09
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 19 views
S. 153A provides that where a search is initiated u/s 132 the AO shall “assess or reassess the total income of six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year” relevant to the previous year in which the search is conducted or requisition is made. The 1st Proviso states that the AO shall “assess or reassess the total income in respect of each assessment year falling within such six assessment years” while the 2nd Proviso states that the assessment o..
Full Article
- Friday, January 22, 2010, 8:38
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 33 views
Section 46(2) provides that when a shareholder receives money or any other asset from a company on its liquidation, then such shareholder shall be charged to capital gains tax. This capital gain is on account of transfer of shares effected by extinguishment of rights in the shares. The section further provides that sales consideration for the purpose of computing capital gains will be money actually received or fair market value of the asset on the date of distribution, ..
Full Article
- Sunday, January 10, 2010, 13:40
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 4 views
n this decision, vide order dated 15.9.2008, the Hon'ble Apex Court had held that even a decision of Apex Court or Jurisdictional High Court rendered subsequent to the Tribunal decision can render the said Tribunal decision liable of rectification of mistake apparent from record. In view of the aforesaid discussion and precedent, we are inclined to dismiss this appeal by the Revenue on account of tax effect, when on similar facts Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court has dis..
Full Article
- Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 3:30
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 77 views
Coming to the first point of difference it seems to me that even after the introduction of block of assets concept, there is no change in the legal position to the effect that the assessee^ would be entitled to depreciation even though the assets in question were not actually put to use in the relevant previous year, but were kept ready for being put to use for the purpose of the business. The judgment of the Hon'ble Madras High Court, on this question is in C1T vs. Vayi..
Full Article
- Sunday, November 1, 2009, 9:06
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 0 views
We have duly considered the rival contentions and the material on record. The crux of the matter is to determine the true character of the receipt in the hands of the assessee and not the utilization thereof. The utilization will not determine the nature of the receipt. The assessee may mis-utilise the funds but that will not either determine or change the character of the receipt. The foremost thing to be appreciated is that the assessee has taken
Full Article
- Sunday, October 18, 2009, 18:56
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 5 views
Unless and until the terms and conditions of advance are known and agreed between the parties, assessee will not acquire any right to receive interest on the advanced loan and no income would accrue by way of interest.
Full Article
- Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:15
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 2 views
In The Case of :- EMA India vs. ACIT , Decided by :- Allahabad High Court In respect of AY 2000-01, the assessee filed a ROI. In the accompanying balance sheet it was disclosed that prior period expenditure of Rs. 5,41,850 was debited to the P&L A/c and that interest of Rs. 8,34,720 receivable from [...]
Full Article
- Sunday, August 16, 2009, 14:39
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 251 views
CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, BANGALORE BENCH `B’ , In The case of: ACIT v Khoday India Ltd, Appeal No.: ITA No. 338/Bang/08, Decided on: December 12, 2008 RELEVENT PARAGRAPH 4.1 The Assessing Officer from the details filed noticed that the assessee has claimed a sum of Rs.3,24,91,003/- as deferred revenue expenditure. The assessee vide letter dated 15th [...]
Full Article