acit

s.153A does not authorize de novo assessment. Non-pending assessments do not abate. Additions must be confined to search material

S. 153A provides that where a search is initiated u/s 132 the AO shall “assess or reassess the total income of six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year” relevant to the previous year in which the search is conducted or requisition is made. The 1st Proviso states that the AO shall “assess or reassess the total income in respect of each assessment year falling within such six assessment years” while the 2nd Proviso states that the assessment o..
Full Article

In case of transfer of an asset distributed by a company in liquidation, cost of acquisition of same has to be taken as cost to previous owner for purpose of computing capital gains thereon

Section 46(2) provides that when a shareholder receives money or any other asset from a company on its liquidation, then such shareholder shall be charged to capital gains tax. This capital gain is on account of transfer of shares effected by extinguishment of rights in the shares. The section further provides that sales consideration for the purpose of computing capital gains will be money actually received or fair market value of the asset on the date of distribution, ..
Full Article

Tribunal, in no circumstances whatsoever, can be led to take a different view on same facts and law on which Jurisdictional High Court has already taken a view

n this decision, vide order dated 15.9.2008, the Hon'ble Apex Court had held that even a decision of Apex Court or Jurisdictional High Court rendered subsequent to the Tribunal decision can render the said Tribunal decision liable of rectification of mistake apparent from record. In view of the aforesaid discussion and precedent, we are inclined to dismiss this appeal by the Revenue on account of tax effect, when on similar facts Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court has dis..
Full Article

Allowability of depreciation on a plant which was ready for use but not used

Coming to the first point of difference it seems to me that even after the introduction of block of assets concept, there is no change in the legal position to the effect that the assessee^ would be entitled to depreciation even though the assets in question were not actually put to use in the relevant previous year, but were kept ready for being put to use for the purpose of the business. The judgment of the Hon'ble Madras High Court, on this question is in C1T vs. Vayi..
Full Article

True character of receipt in the hands of assessee can not be judged by utilization thereof

We have duly considered the rival contentions and the material on record. The crux of the matter is to determine the true character of the receipt in the hands of the assessee and not the utilization thereof. The utilization will not determine the nature of the receipt. The assessee may mis-utilise the funds but that will not either determine or change the character of the receipt. The foremost thing to be appreciated is that the assessee has taken
Full Article

If assessee has no enforceable right to receive interest then there can not be accrual of income

Unless and until the terms and conditions of advance are known and agreed between the parties, assessee will not acquire any right to receive interest on the advanced loan and no income would accrue by way of interest.
Full Article

An order passed without discussion is liable for reopening

In The Case of :- EMA India vs. ACIT , Decided by :- Allahabad High Court In respect of AY 2000-01, the assessee filed a ROI. In the accompanying balance sheet it was disclosed that prior period expenditure of Rs. 5,41,850 was debited to the P&L A/c and that interest of Rs. 8,34,720 receivable from [...]
Full Article

If the expenses are of revenue nature, then the same are to be allowed and section 35D will not be applicable

CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, BANGALORE BENCH `B’ ,  In The case of: ACIT v Khoday India Ltd,  Appeal No.: ITA No. 338/Bang/08, Decided on: December 12, 2008 RELEVENT PARAGRAPH 4.1     The Assessing Officer from the details filed noticed that the assessee has claimed a sum of Rs.3,24,91,003/- as deferred revenue expenditure. The assessee vide letter dated 15th [...]
Full Article
Page 1 of 212
Copyright © TaxGuru 2011. All Rights Reserved.
About Us - Advertise - Privacy Policy - Back to top