- Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 10:16
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 27 views
In AY 2002-2003, the assessee claimed deduction u/s 80-IB (10) of Rs. 3.85 crs which was allowed by the AO vide s. 143 (3) order. The assessment was reopened u/s 147 after the expiry of four years from the end of the assessment year on the ground that the claim for deduction u/s 80IB (10) included ineligible items of other income such ’society deposit’, ’stilt parking’ and sundry credit balances and that income had thereby escaped assessment. The assessee filed a..
Full Article
- Sunday, January 10, 2010, 13:07
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 9 views
In Y. Venugopala Reddy Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and another, (2003) 263 ITR 30, the Karnataka High Court interpreted the words 'notwithstanding' used in Section 88 of KVSS and has held that a matter which has already been settled cannot be reopened under the scheme and the benefit under the scheme should not be extended to an assessee even with regard to the admitted income.
Full Article
- Friday, December 25, 2009, 16:48
- Corporate Law
- 2 views
The Applicant, an informer of the department, filed a RTI application seeking inspection & copies of all records available with the income tax department including assessment orders of Escorts Ltd, Dr. Naresh Trehan and connected parties. The application was rejected by the PIO on the ground that there was no overriding public interest in disclosing the information relating to third parties and the disclosure would lead to an invasion of privacy of the assessees. On appe..
Full Article
- Monday, December 21, 2009, 2:24
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 6 views
After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and going through the mpugned order, we do not find any merit in the instant appeal. It is the conceded position that in the assessee's balance sheet, the aforesaid liabilities have been shown, which are payable to the sundry creditors. Such liabilities, shown in the balance sheet, indicate the acknowledgment of the debts payable by the assessee. Merely because such liability is outstanding for the last six years, it cannot..
Full Article
- Saturday, December 12, 2009, 1:30
- General Info
- 4 views
The Supreme Court has held that banks are liable to compensate a customer whose money is wrongly paid to another person without verifying the original signature of the account-holder as it amounted to deficiency of service. A bench of Justices D K Jain and T S Thakur said the bank was guilty of honouring the cheque presented by the fraudster by releasing an amount over and above the amount in the account even though the customer Gurnam Singh had no overdraft facility.
Full Article
- Saturday, December 5, 2009, 15:15
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 104 views
The taxpayer was a banking company. In the current appeal, the Revenue’s grievance was that the CIT(A) had erred in directing that the written back ”provision of bad-debts” was not taxable as ”business income” especial y when a deduction of a sum was already al owed under Section 36(1) (vi a). The AO in the assessment order held that such write off of the provision for bad and doubtful debts was allowed as deduction in the previous years and therefore the cu..
Full Article
- Sunday, July 26, 2009, 12:51
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 23 views
SUMMARY OF CASE LAW The service of notice on the wife of the assessee in his absence is entirely in accordance with the law as laid down in Order V Rule 15 of the CPC and section 282(1) of the Act. CASE LAW DETAILS Decided by: ITAT, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR, In The case of: ITO v. [...]
Full Article
- Thursday, June 4, 2009, 8:26
- Income Tax Case Laws
- 4 views
AS per Rule 34 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, (1) The order of the Bench shall be in writing and shall be signed and dated by the Members constituting it. (2) The Members constituting the Bench or, in the event of their absence by retirement or otherwise, the Vice-President, Senior Vice-President or the [...]
Full Article