Prior scrutiny of accounts before referring them for special audit is sine qua-non and if the same has not been done the direction for special audit is bad in law and hence assessment framed becomes nullity

Jyoti Traders Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai )-

 In our view the conditions precedent for passing an order u/s.142(2A) of the Act directing the Assessee to get its account audited by a special auditor viz., the satisfaction of the AO having regard to the nature and complexity of the accounts of the assessee and the interest of the revenue, that is necessary get the assessee’s account audited by a special auditor is not fulfilled in the present case and therefore the reference to special audit is held to be invalid. Consequently, the extended time available for passing the order of assessment in terms of Sec.158BE of the Act cannot also be availed by the AO. The order of assessment is therefore held to be barred by limitation. The order of assessment is therefore invalid and the consequent action u/s.263 of the Act setting aside such invalid assessment cannot also be sustained.

Download Full Text of the Judgment

Related posts:

1. Oracle India challenge special audit direction by income tax department in Delhi high court
2. Validity of an assessment framed under section 153A of IT Act in case of a person not searched
3. Income tax department orders special audit of Commonwealth Games Organising Committee books
4. Post Supreme Court Direction – CBDT instruction on use of technical expert’s opinion in assessment proceedings
5. Power of AO to extend period for completion of special audit u/s 142(2A) of IT Act, 1961