Mere production of PAN Number or assessment particulars does not establish the identity of a person. The identification of a person includes the place of work, the staff and the fact that it was actually carrying on business and further recognition of the said company/individual in the eyes of public. We have further noticed that PAN Numbers are allotted on the basis of applications without actual de facto verification of the identity or ascertainment of the active nature of business activity. PAN Number is allotted as a facility to revenue to keep track of transactions. The PAN Number cannot be blindly and without consideration of surrounding circumstances treated as sufficiently disclosing the identity of the individual.

Following CIT VS NOVA PROMOTERS AND FINLEASE PRIVATE LIMITED CASE (2012) 342 ITR 169 (DELHI) we have held that in view of the link between the entry providers and incriminating evidence, mere filing of PAN Number, acknowledgement of Income Tax Returns of the entry providers, bank account statement is not sufficient to discharge the onus on the Assessee.

Source – CIT VS NR Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) (Income Tax Appeal No. 1018 OF 2011 and 1019 OF 2011) , Judgment dated 22nd November, 2013

More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (20765)
Type : Judiciary (8875)
Tags : high court judgments (3219) pan number (248) Section 68 (136)

Search Posts by Date

August 2016
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031