Income Tax Officer Sentenced In Bribery Case

The Special Judge, CBI cases, Jabalpur has convicted Shri Y. Brahmane, the then Income Tax Inspector, Income Tax Office, Balaghat (MP) and sentenced him to undergo three years Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 3,000/- in a bribery case. Another accused Shri Sunil Hattele, Daily Wages Employee of Income Tax Office, Balaghat (MP) was also convicted and sentenced to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment in the same case.

After conducting a thorough investigation, CBI filed charge sheet before the court of Special Judge, CBI Cases, Jabalpur, U/s 120-B IPC and 7 & 13(2) r/w 13 (1)(d) Act, 1988 alleging that the accused Shri Y. Bramhane while functioning as Inspector, Income Tax, Distt. Balaghat had demanded an illegal gratification of Rs.20,000/- through his office subordinate Shri Sunil Hattele, a Daily Wages Employee, from the complainant, an Assistant Professor of a Govt. Post Graduate College, Balaghat (MP) for closing a complaint against him. The Trial Court found both the accused guilty and convicted them.

Related posts:

  1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax sentenced to undergo three years imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1.50 Lacs in a bribery case
  2. Income Tax Officer and His Wife Sentenced In a Disproportionate Assets Case
  3. Manager of UCO Bank and seven others sentenced in a corruption case
  4. CBI arrests a field officer of State Bank of India in a bribery case
  5. CBI arrests an Income Tax Officer and a Chartered Accountant in a bribery case

One Comment on “Income Tax Officer Sentenced In Bribery Case”

  • ram babu b.com wrote on 16 November, 2011, 10:27

    This is a legally recorded example. Same thing happened to me at Hyderabad-aayakar Bhavan.
    The ‘attender’ who brought out the return with the status that the refund is ready provide Bank details for immediate processing.
    I immediately paid the processing charges of 1,500 for a refund of Rs.8 / 9,000. After 10-15 days i went back and asked the concerned I.T.O.He coolly saed that the attender is not a regular employee. He is engaged on daily basis. (Thus conveying ? he can do)

    (Of course I did not get the same till date.)

    Now I ask the communist parties who blame Capitalist countries for everything – should answer for this(As I consider no one else is the right person to answer).

Write a Comment

Copyright © TaxGuru 2011. All Rights Reserved.
About Us - Advertise - Privacy Policy - Back to top