Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax - XI Vs Delhi House And Finanace Corporation (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : + ITA 38/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (2217) Delhi High Court (690)

AO not relay upon an Inspector’s report while estimating the rate of plots with which the respondent had not been confronted.

It is also pertinent to note that he had only made verbal inquiries with regard to the prevailing market rate of the property and had not collected any instances of actual sales in the said areas. Furthermore, the inquiry that he made was as on the date of his visit, that is on 02.03.2006, whereas the sales had taken place in the financial year ending 31.03.2003. He also stated that he had made inquiries from only 2-3 persons. It is obvious that when such statements are made in cross-examination, his report with regard to the rate of land being 6,000/- per sq. yd. to 7,000/- per sq. yd. in the two localities could not have much evidentiary value, if at all. He had specifically indicated in his cross-examination that he had inquired about the likely rate at which he could buy property at that time. Thus, even the rates indicated by him in his report, were not of financial year ending 2003-04 but, were of the date he visited, that is, 02.03.2006.

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (23898)
Type : Judiciary (9118)
Tags : high court judgments (3320)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

February 2017
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728