Tax implications of ‘employee secondment’ contracts : ITAT Bangalore

IDS Software Solutions vs. ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Where the assessee entered into a ‘secondment agreement’ with a US Company and obtained the services of an employee and the question arose whether the reimbursement by the assessee to the US Company of the salary paid by the US Company was chargeable to tax as “fees for technical services” HELD:

(i) Though the US Co was the employer in a legal sense but since the services of the employee had been seconded to the assessee and since the assessee was to reimburse the emoluments and it controlled the services of the employee, it was the assessee which for all practical purposes was the employer. Accordingly, the salary reimbursed to the US Co was not chargeable to tax;

(ii) Though the person deputed by the US Co was a technical person, the consideration paid under the secondment agreement was not “fees for technical services” because the fact that the seconded employee
was responsible and subservient to the payer (assessee) and was required to also act as officer or authorized signatory or nominee of the assessee made it inconsistent with an agreement for providing technical services.

AT & S India P. Ltd 287 ITR 421 (AAR) – where a secondment agreement was held to constitute technical services distinguished.

Related posts:

1. AAR on obligation of an Indian company to deduct tax at source for payments made to a Korean company under ‘Secondment Agreement’
2. Even a Contractor is a “Developer” for purposes of s. 80-IA(4): ITAT Jaipur
3. Employer does not credit TDS to Govt – Can it be recovered again from employee by Income Tax?
4. Computation of profit in case of construction contracts
5. Scrap sales would be included in total turnover for purpose of calculating deduction u/s 80HHC – ITAT