Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subodh Kumar Bhargava Vs Commissioner of Income-Tax (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The tribunal was not right in law in its interpretation of the provisions of Section 275(1)(c) and was wrong in holding that the penalty order passed on 17.02.2004 under Section 271B was within the period of limitation prescribed under the Act.  IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT New Delhi ITA 243/2008 SUBODH KUMAR BHARGAVA … Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX … Respondent  For the Appellant : Dr Rakesh Gupta with Ms Poonam Ahuja and Ms Aarti and Saini For the Respondent : Ms Prem Lata Bansal CORAM:- MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED and MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930