Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prontos Steerings Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
The limitation period prescribed under section 11B for filing the refund claim is one year from the relevant date. The term ‘relevant date’ in the case where the duty becomes refundable as the consequences of judgment, decree, order or direction of the Appellate authority, appellate Tribunal or any Court has been defined in Explanation (B)(ec) of section 11B as the “date of such judgment, decree or direction. CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH Prontos Steerings Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise FINAL ORDER NO. 509/2011-SM(BR)(PB) APPEAL NO. E/3022/2009-(SM)(BR)...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930